Virtua Fighter 5 REVO · v1.10 · Rank 30–46
Stage Impact To Win Probability
Matches counted372,061
Stage types10
Most affectedTaka
Widest swing6.5 pts
Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23
Who the stage matters to
Best stage against worst, in pointsEvery character, every stage
Change from that character's own win rate, in points| Character | Full | Break. full | Half | Break. half | Low | Wall | Mixed | Oct | Rect | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3.0 | -0.1 | -0.5 | +0.1 | +3.2 | +3.5 | +3.1 | -1.9 | -1.1 | -1.7 | |
| +1.4 | -0.1 | -0.2 | -2.0 | +2.3 | +1.0 | +1.4 | -2.4 | +0.6 | -1.0 | |
| +0.3 | +0.3 | +0.6 | +1.4 | -1.2 | -0.4 | +0.3 | +1.7 | -2.3 | -0.1 | |
| -0.1 | +0.6 | +0.6 | +0.7 | -0.8 | -1.0 | -2.3 | +1.2 | +0.4 | -0.1 | |
| +0.8 | +0.6 | -0.6 | -0.3 | +0.0 | -1.1 | +0.7 | +0.3 | +1.8 | -1.6 | |
| -0.4 | -1.3 | -0.6 | -0.1 | -0.2 | +2.1 | -1.1 | -0.2 | -0.3 | +1.7 | |
| +0.3 | +1.7 | -0.1 | -0.8 | -1.6 | +0.1 | +0.7 | +0.2 | +0.4 | +0.1 | |
| -0.7 | -0.6 | -0.6 | -0.2 | +0.2 | +0.4 | +0.5 | -1.0 | +0.1 | +1.8 | |
| -0.2 | +0.3 | -1.2 | -0.9 | -0.1 | +1.5 | +0.7 | -0.1 | +1.2 | +0.7 | |
| -0.3 | -1.6 | -0.5 | +0.5 | +1.1 | +0.0 | +0.6 | +0.9 | -1.1 | -0.2 | |
| -0.2 | -0.1 | +0.5 | +0.4 | +0.7 | +0.1 | +1.8 | -0.2 | -0.8 | -0.9 | |
| -1.2 | -0.3 | -0.7 | -0.3 | -1.0 | -0.5 | +0.4 | +0.3 | +0.9 | +1.5 | |
| +0.1 | -0.3 | +1.5 | +0.9 | +0.9 | -1.1 | -0.8 | +0.7 | -0.7 | -1.0 | |
| -0.2 | -0.8 | -1.3 | +0.6 | -0.7 | +0.9 | +0.8 | +1.2 | -0.6 | +0.0 | |
| -0.1 | +0.6 | -0.1 | -1.2 | +0.8 | -0.7 | -1.1 | -0.9 | +0.3 | +0.8 | |
| +0.5 | +0.6 | +0.7 | -0.5 | -1.0 | -0.7 | -0.7 | +0.2 | +0.8 | +0.3 | |
| +0.9 | -0.8 | +0.6 | +0.6 | -0.3 | -0.1 | -0.8 | -0.4 | -0.6 | -0.0 | |
| -0.4 | -0.2 | +0.1 | +0.2 | +0.3 | -0.2 | -0.5 | -0.7 | +0.8 | -0.7 | |
| -0.4 | +2.7 | -2.1 | -0.5 | +0.9 | +0.3 | -1.4 | -3.0 | +0.0 | +1.8 | |
| +1.1 | +0.1 | +0.9 | +0.5 | +0.1 | -0.8 | -3.0 | +0.5 | +1.6 | -2.6 |
Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage
The matchups the stage decides
One matchup on one stage, against the same matchup everywhere| Matchup | Stage | Overall | On this stage | Change | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breakable full fence | 52.0% | 65.2% | +13.2 | 204 | |
| Full fence | 50.0% | 60.5% | +10.5 | 162 | |
| Low fence | 47.7% | 58.2% | +10.4 | 287 | |
| Rectangle | 53.7% | 63.4% | +9.7 | 183 | |
| Full fence | 49.0% | 58.1% | +9.1 | 179 | |
| Breakable full fence | 49.2% | 58.3% | +9.1 | 254 | |
| Single wall | 47.9% | 56.5% | +8.6 | 209 | |
| Rectangle | 50.0% | 58.5% | +8.5 | 212 | |
| Open | 51.5% | 59.9% | +8.3 | 177 | |
| Rectangle | 45.7% | 54.0% | +8.3 | 187 | |
| Breakable half fence | 51.7% | 60.0% | +8.3 | 230 | |
| Breakable half fence | 49.1% | 57.3% | +8.2 | 192 | |
| Full fence | 45.7% | 53.8% | +8.1 | 277 | |
| Breakable full fence | 51.8% | 59.9% | +8.1 | 162 | |
| Rectangle | 51.4% | 59.4% | +8.0 | 207 | |
| Full fence | 50.2% | 58.1% | +7.8 | 353 | |
| Open | 46.4% | 54.2% | +7.8 | 249 | |
| Open | 52.2% | 59.9% | +7.7 | 177 | |
| Breakable half fence | 49.3% | 56.9% | +7.6 | 188 | |
| Fence and open | 51.8% | 59.3% | +7.5 | 258 | |
| Full fence | 46.7% | 54.1% | +7.5 | 205 | |
| Single wall | 48.6% | 56.1% | +7.5 | 189 | |
| Open | 46.3% | 53.7% | +7.3 | 190 | |
| Open | 50.6% | 57.9% | +7.3 | 164 |
Every stage type
How much of the data each stage type is| Stage | Matches | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Full fence | 37,871 | 10.18% |
| Breakable full fence | 37,371 | 10.04% |
| Half fence | 36,946 | 9.93% |
| Breakable half fence | 37,189 | 10.00% |
| Low fence | 36,959 | 9.93% |
| Single wall | 36,906 | 9.92% |
| Fence and open | 18,404 | 4.95% |
| Octagon | 37,605 | 10.11% |
| Rectangle | 37,374 | 10.05% |
| Open | 37,037 | 9.95% |
| Not recorded | 18,399 | 4.95% |
Matches counted372,061
Stage groups2
Most affected—
Widest walls gap—
Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23
Who the walls suit
Walled stages against open ones, in pointsBetter in the openBetter behind wallsWithin chance95% interval
Is any of this chance?
The whole cut, tested at onceWalled stages dealt evenly across the rosterχ²=12.9 on 19 df, p=0.845
Matches sharing one stage drawabout 2.0, so a match is not an independent draw
Allowance made for thatevery interval and p-value here widened by ×1.12
Characters whose gap holds up0 of 20 — chance alone would give about 1.0
Matchups whose gap holds up0 of 128 — chance alone would give about 6.4
The roster taken togetherχ²=159.7 on 128 df, p=0.030
Every character, tested
The gap, the range it could be, and the odds of it being nothing| Character | Behind walls | In the open | Gap | 95% interval | p | q (corrected) | Matches | Players |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.0% | 49.2% | +1.8 | -0.9 … +4.6 | 0.197 | 0.328 | 6,943 | 82 | |
| 51.1% | 49.8% | +1.3 | +0.1 … +2.5 | 0.029 | 0.155 | 37,577 | 368 | |
| 50.2% | 49.1% | +1.2 | -0.1 … +2.5 | 0.082 | 0.235 | 30,774 | 281 | |
| 50.0% | 49.1% | +0.9 | -0.4 … +2.1 | 0.169 | 0.318 | 34,608 | 250 | |
| 49.6% | 48.8% | +0.8 | -0.1 … +1.7 | 0.077 | 0.235 | 66,769 | 448 | |
| 51.8% | 51.0% | +0.8 | -0.3 … +1.9 | 0.175 | 0.318 | 42,360 | 333 | |
| 49.7% | 48.9% | +0.8 | -0.2 … +1.7 | 0.109 | 0.273 | 62,120 | 494 | |
| 50.0% | 49.8% | +0.2 | -1.2 … +1.6 | 0.801 | 0.843 | 27,421 | 199 | |
| 49.3% | 49.2% | +0.2 | -1.1 … +1.4 | 0.797 | 0.843 | 34,740 | 300 | |
| 51.4% | 51.4% | +0.0 | -1.1 … +1.1 | 0.997 | 0.997 | 43,185 | 392 | |
| 49.6% | 49.9% | -0.2 | -1.6 … +1.2 | 0.752 | 0.843 | 27,699 | 197 | |
| 50.3% | 50.5% | -0.2 | -1.5 … +1.0 | 0.691 | 0.843 | 34,527 | 278 | |
| 48.0% | 48.5% | -0.5 | -1.7 … +0.7 | 0.385 | 0.513 | 38,590 | 321 | |
| 48.7% | 49.3% | -0.7 | -1.9 … +0.6 | 0.306 | 0.437 | 34,024 | 245 | |
| 51.5% | 52.4% | -0.9 | -2.3 … +0.6 | 0.244 | 0.375 | 25,700 | 248 | |
| 48.2% | 49.5% | -1.3 | -2.7 … +0.1 | 0.080 | 0.235 | 26,361 | 202 | |
| 48.3% | 49.6% | -1.3 | -2.6 … -0.1 | 0.031 | 0.155 | 36,511 | 281 | |
| 52.1% | 53.6% | -1.5 | -3.7 … +0.7 | 0.174 | 0.318 | 11,459 | 168 | |
| 50.4% | 52.1% | -1.7 | -2.9 … -0.5 | 0.006 | 0.118 | 36,872 | 321 | |
| 52.5% | 55.2% | -2.7 | -4.8 … -0.6 | 0.012 | 0.118 | 12,276 | 182 |
How significance is decided
- Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
- The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
- q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
- Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
- Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.
Every character, every stage
Change from that character's own win rate, in points| Character | Walls | No walls |
|---|---|---|
| +0.8 | -1.1 | |
| +0.4 | -0.9 | |
| +0.6 | -0.6 | |
| +0.3 | -0.6 | |
| +0.4 | -0.4 | |
| +0.3 | -0.5 | |
| +0.3 | -0.4 | |
| -0.0 | -0.2 | |
| +0.0 | -0.1 | |
| -0.1 | -0.1 | |
| -0.2 | +0.0 | |
| -0.1 | +0.1 | |
| -0.2 | +0.3 | |
| -0.3 | +0.3 | |
| -0.2 | +0.7 | |
| -0.5 | +0.8 | |
| -0.5 | +0.8 | |
| -0.5 | +1.0 | |
| -0.5 | +1.2 | |
| -1.1 | +1.6 |
Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage
The widest matchup gaps
One matchup behind walls against the same matchup in the open, widest first — none of them survives correction| Matchup | Behind walls | In the open | Gap | 95% interval | p | q (corrected) | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.7% | 45.2% | +6.5 | +1.6 … +11.4 | 0.010 | 0.628 | 2,163 | |
| 52.3% | 46.0% | +6.3 | +1.7 … +10.8 | 0.007 | 0.628 | 2,735 | |
| 52.9% | 46.6% | +6.3 | +0.2 … +12.3 | 0.043 | 0.856 | 1,493 | |
| 53.9% | 47.9% | +6.0 | -0.0 … +12.0 | 0.051 | 0.856 | 1,467 | |
| 48.2% | 42.4% | +5.8 | +0.7 … +10.9 | 0.027 | 0.856 | 2,009 | |
| 51.5% | 45.7% | +5.8 | -0.1 … +11.6 | 0.055 | 0.856 | 1,592 | |
| 47.0% | 41.7% | +5.3 | -0.8 … +11.3 | 0.087 | 0.856 | 1,532 | |
| 51.7% | 46.4% | +5.3 | -1.0 … +11.6 | 0.101 | 0.856 | 1,341 | |
| 51.5% | 46.6% | +4.8 | -1.5 … +11.0 | 0.133 | 0.856 | 1,412 | |
| 53.5% | 48.8% | +4.7 | -0.6 … +10.0 | 0.081 | 0.856 | 1,899 | |
| 50.9% | 46.2% | +4.7 | -0.3 … +9.7 | 0.068 | 0.856 | 2,085 | |
| 51.9% | 47.5% | +4.5 | -1.7 … +10.6 | 0.156 | 0.856 | 1,402 | |
| 53.2% | 48.7% | +4.5 | -0.6 … +9.5 | 0.082 | 0.856 | 2,178 | |
| 53.9% | 49.4% | +4.5 | -1.0 … +9.9 | 0.111 | 0.856 | 1,745 | |
| 56.6% | 52.2% | +4.4 | -1.3 … +10.1 | 0.132 | 0.856 | 1,580 | |
| 47.5% | 43.2% | +4.3 | -1.4 … +9.9 | 0.142 | 0.856 | 1,597 | |
| 48.8% | 44.5% | +4.3 | -0.6 … +9.1 | 0.087 | 0.856 | 2,282 | |
| 51.0% | 46.8% | +4.2 | -0.2 … +8.6 | 0.060 | 0.856 | 2,721 | |
| 53.6% | 49.4% | +4.2 | -0.5 … +8.9 | 0.081 | 0.856 | 2,399 | |
| 46.8% | 42.6% | +4.1 | -2.4 … +10.6 | 0.216 | 0.856 | 1,204 | |
| 52.4% | 48.5% | +4.0 | -1.8 … +9.7 | 0.174 | 0.856 | 1,621 | |
| 52.7% | 49.0% | +3.7 | -1.6 … +8.9 | 0.172 | 0.856 | 1,904 | |
| 50.4% | 46.7% | +3.7 | -2.4 … +9.7 | 0.238 | 0.856 | 1,491 | |
| 52.7% | 49.1% | +3.7 | -1.9 … +9.2 | 0.197 | 0.856 | 1,723 |
Every stage type
How much of the data each stage type is| Stage | Matches | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Walls | 224,356 | 60.30% |
| No walls | 110,902 | 29.81% |
| Not recorded | 18,399 | 4.95% |
Matches counted318,500
Stage types10
Most affectedTaka
Widest swing7.7 pts
Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23
Who the stage matters to
Best stage against worst, in pointsEvery character, every stage
Change from that character's own win rate, in points| Character | Full | Break. full | Half | Break. half | Low | Wall | Mixed | Oct | Rect | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.9 | -0.2 | -0.9 | +0.7 | +4.0 | +3.5 | +2.3 | -3.7 | -0.0 | -1.1 | |
| +2.1 | +0.1 | +0.2 | -2.5 | +3.1 | +0.5 | +0.6 | -1.9 | +0.1 | -1.2 | |
| -0.3 | -1.4 | -0.0 | -0.3 | +0.0 | +2.8 | -0.9 | -0.6 | -0.7 | +1.1 | |
| +0.1 | +0.4 | -1.6 | -0.4 | -1.1 | +2.4 | +0.4 | +0.5 | +1.1 | +0.2 | |
| +0.5 | -0.2 | +1.9 | +1.0 | +0.8 | -1.9 | -1.4 | +0.6 | -0.4 | -1.3 | |
| -0.3 | +0.6 | +0.1 | +1.3 | -0.9 | -0.0 | +0.3 | +1.4 | -2.2 | +0.4 | |
| +0.2 | +0.9 | +0.7 | +0.8 | -0.8 | -1.6 | -2.2 | +1.2 | +0.3 | -0.0 | |
| +0.8 | +0.7 | -1.0 | +0.1 | -0.3 | -0.6 | +0.5 | +0.7 | +1.6 | -1.8 | |
| -0.0 | +1.7 | -0.4 | -1.1 | -1.4 | -0.1 | +1.0 | -0.7 | +1.1 | +0.7 | |
| +0.0 | -0.4 | +0.4 | +1.2 | +0.5 | +0.6 | +1.4 | -0.6 | -1.5 | -0.7 | |
| -0.9 | -0.6 | -1.1 | -0.3 | -1.1 | -0.5 | +0.7 | +0.1 | +1.1 | +1.6 | |
| -0.5 | -0.8 | -1.0 | +0.7 | -1.0 | +0.9 | +0.7 | +1.5 | -0.3 | -0.4 | |
| -0.4 | -1.3 | -0.2 | +0.1 | +0.6 | +0.7 | +0.9 | +0.8 | -1.5 | -0.4 | |
| -0.3 | +0.7 | -0.0 | -1.4 | +1.1 | -1.0 | -0.6 | -0.7 | +0.5 | +0.7 | |
| -0.8 | -0.5 | -0.7 | -0.4 | +0.0 | +0.5 | +1.4 | -0.5 | -0.1 | +1.6 | |
| +0.6 | +0.6 | +0.5 | -0.8 | -0.8 | -0.6 | -1.0 | +0.2 | +1.0 | +0.5 | |
| -1.0 | -0.4 | -0.2 | +0.3 | +0.4 | -0.6 | +0.3 | -0.8 | +0.8 | +0.0 | |
| +0.7 | -0.9 | +0.7 | +0.7 | -0.1 | -0.5 | -0.6 | -0.2 | -0.9 | +0.1 | |
| +1.0 | +0.2 | +1.3 | +0.2 | +0.0 | -0.2 | -1.5 | +0.2 | +0.9 | -3.1 | |
| -1.1 | +1.5 | -1.9 | -1.3 | +1.8 | +1.5 | -2.0 | -2.6 | +0.0 | +1.9 |
Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage
The matchups the stage decides
One matchup on one stage, against the same matchup everywhere| Matchup | Stage | Overall | On this stage | Change | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breakable full fence | 50.2% | 65.2% | +15.0 | 161 | |
| Low fence | 54.9% | 67.1% | +12.2 | 155 | |
| Low fence | 47.6% | 57.6% | +10.0 | 255 | |
| Octagon | 49.8% | 59.6% | +9.8 | 166 | |
| Single wall | 50.0% | 59.6% | +9.7 | 166 | |
| Full fence | 49.0% | 58.3% | +9.3 | 163 | |
| Single wall | 47.7% | 57.0% | +9.3 | 186 | |
| Rectangle | 54.0% | 63.2% | +9.2 | 174 | |
| Breakable full fence | 48.9% | 58.1% | +9.2 | 241 | |
| Low fence | 51.4% | 60.4% | +9.0 | 245 | |
| Breakable full fence | 55.8% | 64.5% | +8.7 | 152 | |
| Breakable half fence | 52.0% | 60.6% | +8.6 | 203 | |
| Full fence | 50.5% | 59.0% | +8.5 | 322 | |
| Low fence | 49.0% | 57.5% | +8.5 | 146 | |
| Breakable half fence | 50.2% | 58.6% | +8.4 | 348 | |
| Single wall | 50.9% | 59.3% | +8.4 | 356 | |
| Open | 50.7% | 59.0% | +8.3 | 161 | |
| Fence and open | 51.4% | 59.4% | +8.1 | 143 | |
| Rectangle | 51.0% | 59.0% | +8.0 | 200 | |
| Breakable half fence | 49.8% | 57.8% | +8.0 | 147 | |
| Low fence | 46.6% | 54.5% | +8.0 | 242 | |
| Half fence | 51.0% | 58.9% | +7.9 | 151 | |
| Open | 46.0% | 53.9% | +7.9 | 180 | |
| Single wall | 49.0% | 56.9% | +7.9 | 167 |
Every stage type
How much of the data each stage type is| Stage | Matches | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Full fence | 32,531 | 10.21% |
| Breakable full fence | 31,993 | 10.04% |
| Half fence | 31,534 | 9.90% |
| Breakable half fence | 31,798 | 9.98% |
| Low fence | 31,706 | 9.95% |
| Single wall | 31,515 | 9.89% |
| Fence and open | 15,745 | 4.94% |
| Octagon | 32,209 | 10.11% |
| Rectangle | 31,893 | 10.01% |
| Open | 31,765 | 9.97% |
| Not recorded | 15,811 | 4.96% |
Matches counted318,500
Stage groups2
Most affected—
Widest walls gap—
Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23
Who the walls suit
Walled stages against open ones, in pointsBetter in the openBetter behind wallsWithin chance95% interval
Is any of this chance?
The whole cut, tested at onceWalled stages dealt evenly across the rosterχ²=12.3 on 19 df, p=0.871
Matches sharing one stage drawabout 1.9, so a match is not an independent draw
Allowance made for thatevery interval and p-value here widened by ×1.12
Characters whose gap holds up0 of 20 — chance alone would give about 1.0
Matchups whose gap holds up0 of 131 — chance alone would give about 6.6
The roster taken togetherχ²=162.9 on 131 df, p=0.031
Every character, tested
The gap, the range it could be, and the odds of it being nothing| Character | Behind walls | In the open | Gap | 95% interval | p | q (corrected) | Matches | Players |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.0% | 49.3% | +1.7 | -1.2 … +4.5 | 0.257 | 0.505 | 6,471 | 77 | |
| 50.6% | 49.1% | +1.5 | +0.1 … +2.9 | 0.040 | 0.142 | 26,851 | 263 | |
| 51.5% | 50.1% | +1.4 | +0.1 … +2.6 | 0.029 | 0.142 | 34,549 | 354 | |
| 49.6% | 48.3% | +1.3 | +0.3 … +2.3 | 0.009 | 0.058 | 53,734 | 457 | |
| 49.3% | 48.6% | +0.7 | -0.3 … +1.6 | 0.171 | 0.380 | 58,156 | 422 | |
| 50.4% | 50.1% | +0.3 | -1.0 … +1.7 | 0.613 | 0.799 | 30,259 | 238 | |
| 50.9% | 50.6% | +0.3 | -0.9 … +1.6 | 0.601 | 0.799 | 33,025 | 308 | |
| 49.5% | 49.3% | +0.2 | -1.1 … +1.5 | 0.757 | 0.841 | 32,516 | 276 | |
| 50.5% | 50.5% | +0.1 | -1.3 … +1.4 | 0.900 | 0.900 | 29,359 | 253 | |
| 49.0% | 49.1% | -0.1 | -1.7 … +1.4 | 0.851 | 0.896 | 22,767 | 185 | |
| 51.7% | 52.0% | -0.3 | -1.5 … +0.9 | 0.646 | 0.799 | 35,592 | 356 | |
| 49.6% | 49.9% | -0.3 | -1.8 … +1.2 | 0.679 | 0.799 | 24,874 | 187 | |
| 48.0% | 48.4% | -0.5 | -1.7 … +0.8 | 0.443 | 0.738 | 35,150 | 301 | |
| 51.3% | 51.8% | -0.5 | -2.1 … +1.1 | 0.547 | 0.799 | 20,839 | 231 | |
| 48.8% | 49.5% | -0.8 | -2.1 … +0.6 | 0.278 | 0.505 | 28,406 | 233 | |
| 49.5% | 50.7% | -1.2 | -2.8 … +0.4 | 0.153 | 0.380 | 20,677 | 187 | |
| 48.4% | 49.6% | -1.2 | -2.5 … +0.1 | 0.068 | 0.194 | 33,145 | 272 | |
| 50.9% | 52.7% | -1.9 | -3.2 … -0.5 | 0.006 | 0.058 | 29,361 | 296 | |
| 52.2% | 54.9% | -2.6 | -5.2 … -0.1 | 0.043 | 0.142 | 8,278 | 151 | |
| 52.2% | 55.4% | -3.2 | -5.5 … -0.9 | 0.007 | 0.058 | 9,879 | 168 |
How significance is decided
- Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
- The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
- q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
- Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
- Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.
Every character, every stage
Change from that character's own win rate, in points| Character | Walls | No walls |
|---|---|---|
| +0.6 | -1.0 | |
| +0.7 | -0.8 | |
| +0.5 | -0.9 | |
| +0.6 | -0.8 | |
| +0.3 | -0.3 | |
| +0.1 | -0.2 | |
| +0.1 | -0.2 | |
| +0.0 | -0.2 | |
| -0.1 | -0.1 | |
| -0.2 | -0.1 | |
| -0.1 | +0.1 | |
| -0.3 | +0.0 | |
| -0.2 | +0.3 | |
| +0.0 | +0.5 | |
| -0.4 | +0.3 | |
| -0.3 | +0.8 | |
| -0.5 | +0.7 | |
| -0.6 | +1.3 | |
| -0.9 | +1.8 | |
| -1.2 | +2.0 |
Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage
The widest matchup gaps
One matchup behind walls against the same matchup in the open, widest first — none of them survives correction| Matchup | Behind walls | In the open | Gap | 95% interval | p | q (corrected) | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.3% | 44.5% | +8.8 | +1.6 … +15.8 | 0.017 | 0.813 | 1,040 | |
| 50.6% | 43.4% | +7.2 | +2.0 … +12.3 | 0.007 | 0.813 | 2,053 | |
| 49.9% | 42.9% | +7.0 | +0.1 … +13.8 | 0.047 | 0.813 | 1,193 | |
| 52.6% | 45.9% | +6.7 | +0.4 … +13.0 | 0.037 | 0.813 | 1,377 | |
| 53.1% | 46.9% | +6.2 | -0.5 … +12.8 | 0.068 | 0.813 | 1,205 | |
| 52.0% | 46.5% | +5.6 | -0.4 … +11.4 | 0.066 | 0.813 | 1,517 | |
| 46.5% | 41.0% | +5.5 | -0.2 … +11.1 | 0.059 | 0.813 | 1,603 | |
| 47.0% | 41.5% | +5.5 | -1.0 … +11.8 | 0.097 | 0.841 | 1,344 | |
| 53.6% | 48.3% | +5.3 | +0.1 … +10.5 | 0.046 | 0.813 | 1,996 | |
| 51.6% | 46.4% | +5.3 | +0.1 … +10.4 | 0.045 | 0.813 | 1,999 | |
| 51.9% | 46.8% | +5.1 | -2.0 … +12.2 | 0.160 | 0.856 | 1,072 | |
| 46.3% | 41.3% | +5.0 | -1.1 … +11.0 | 0.107 | 0.841 | 1,398 | |
| 48.8% | 44.1% | +4.7 | -0.6 … +9.9 | 0.082 | 0.841 | 1,943 | |
| 52.6% | 47.9% | +4.7 | -1.2 … +10.6 | 0.122 | 0.841 | 1,494 | |
| 52.7% | 48.0% | +4.7 | -1.7 … +11.0 | 0.151 | 0.856 | 1,295 | |
| 51.8% | 47.2% | +4.6 | -0.3 … +9.5 | 0.068 | 0.813 | 2,177 | |
| 51.1% | 46.6% | +4.5 | -0.7 … +9.7 | 0.087 | 0.841 | 1,989 | |
| 57.4% | 53.1% | +4.3 | -1.8 … +10.3 | 0.166 | 0.856 | 1,417 | |
| 52.1% | 47.9% | +4.2 | -0.1 … +8.3 | 0.053 | 0.813 | 3,034 | |
| 54.2% | 50.2% | +4.0 | -1.4 … +9.4 | 0.147 | 0.856 | 1,818 | |
| 55.2% | 51.2% | +4.0 | -2.7 … +10.7 | 0.243 | 0.856 | 1,134 | |
| 53.5% | 49.5% | +4.0 | -1.1 … +9.0 | 0.122 | 0.841 | 2,075 | |
| 52.6% | 48.7% | +3.9 | -0.6 … +8.3 | 0.092 | 0.841 | 2,737 | |
| 49.1% | 45.3% | +3.9 | -2.0 … +9.6 | 0.196 | 0.856 | 1,568 |
Every stage type
How much of the data each stage type is| Stage | Matches | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Walls | 191,958 | 60.27% |
| No walls | 94,986 | 29.82% |
| Not recorded | 15,811 | 4.96% |
Matches counted53,561
Stage types10
Most affectedGoh
Widest swing12.3 pts
Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23
Who the stage matters to
Best stage against worst, in pointsEvery character, every stage
Change from that character's own win rate, in points| Character | Full | Break. full | Half | Break. half | Low | Wall | Mixed | Oct | Rect | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.3 | -1.6 | +0.1 | +2.1 | +2.5 | -0.3 | -8.4 | -5.5 | +1.5 | +4.0 | |
| -3.2 | +0.4 | +1.7 | -2.2 | +0.6 | +3.6 | +6.1 | +6.2 | -5.7 | -4.1 | |
| +0.9 | +0.0 | +4.0 | -5.7 | +4.1 | -6.8 | +3.6 | -3.5 | +3.2 | +0.2 | |
| +2.7 | +1.1 | -0.7 | -0.2 | -1.6 | +5.5 | -7.5 | -4.4 | +4.5 | -0.8 | |
| +1.7 | +5.7 | -2.5 | +1.8 | -2.2 | -3.2 | +0.1 | -3.7 | -0.1 | +1.5 | |
| +2.5 | -0.4 | -0.5 | +0.7 | -2.6 | +2.0 | -6.3 | -3.2 | -1.1 | +2.0 | |
| -1.2 | -0.9 | -1.4 | +0.2 | -1.0 | +3.2 | +4.0 | -4.1 | +2.3 | -0.8 | |
| +4.0 | -1.4 | +4.4 | +2.1 | -3.1 | -2.9 | +0.4 | +3.3 | -3.1 | -3.1 | |
| -1.3 | -0.2 | +0.2 | -3.2 | +3.9 | -2.4 | +1.6 | -2.6 | +1.5 | +2.7 | |
| -0.5 | -0.9 | -2.9 | +0.8 | -0.9 | -0.5 | -1.9 | +1.1 | +1.2 | +4.2 | |
| +0.1 | -3.5 | -2.0 | +2.9 | +3.6 | -3.4 | -0.9 | +1.2 | +1.2 | +0.6 | |
| +2.6 | +0.8 | +1.6 | +0.1 | -0.3 | +1.4 | -4.2 | -0.2 | +0.6 | -4.2 | |
| -4.2 | +1.6 | +2.6 | -0.6 | -0.8 | -0.3 | -2.1 | +1.9 | -1.0 | +0.0 | |
| -2.2 | -1.4 | -0.5 | +0.2 | -1.1 | +3.7 | -3.0 | +0.9 | +1.1 | -0.8 | |
| -2.8 | -1.0 | -1.0 | +0.2 | +1.2 | +3.6 | +3.4 | +0.9 | -2.6 | +1.0 | |
| -1.5 | +1.6 | +0.9 | -2.7 | +1.7 | -2.0 | +3.5 | +1.3 | +2.7 | -2.3 | |
| +1.4 | +2.1 | +0.8 | +0.5 | -2.5 | +0.8 | -0.1 | +3.1 | -2.1 | -2.1 | |
| +1.8 | -0.3 | -2.9 | +0.5 | +1.2 | +1.1 | +1.5 | -0.8 | -2.2 | +2.2 | |
| +0.5 | +0.4 | +1.6 | +1.1 | -1.8 | -1.0 | +0.8 | +0.1 | -0.6 | -0.5 | |
| +3.2 | -0.6 | -4.0 | +3.5 | +1.5 | -9.4 | -37.7 | +3.9 | +11.3 | +5.1 |
Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage
The matchups the stage decides
One matchup on one stage, against the same matchup everywhere| Matchup | Stage | Overall | On this stage | Change | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single wall | 45.4% | 78.6% | +33.2 | 28 | |
| Open | 45.1% | 75.0% | +29.9 | 28 | |
| Octagon | 49.3% | 76.0% | +26.7 | 25 | |
| Half fence | 48.7% | 75.0% | +26.3 | 24 | |
| Breakable full fence | 51.5% | 77.3% | +25.7 | 22 | |
| Single wall | 46.5% | 72.0% | +25.5 | 25 | |
| Breakable half fence | 50.6% | 76.0% | +25.4 | 25 | |
| Rectangle | 44.1% | 69.2% | +25.1 | 26 | |
| Half fence | 45.4% | 69.2% | +23.9 | 26 | |
| Fence and open | 55.5% | 79.2% | +23.6 | 24 | |
| Rectangle | 48.6% | 72.0% | +23.4 | 25 | |
| Octagon | 53.4% | 76.7% | +23.3 | 30 | |
| Half fence | 54.3% | 76.9% | +22.6 | 26 | |
| Rectangle | 53.5% | 75.9% | +22.4 | 29 | |
| Single wall | 47.3% | 69.0% | +21.8 | 42 | |
| Fence and open | 46.6% | 68.0% | +21.4 | 25 | |
| Open | 50.0% | 71.4% | +21.4 | 21 | |
| Full fence | 59.5% | 81.0% | +21.4 | 21 | |
| Full fence | 41.6% | 63.0% | +21.4 | 27 | |
| Breakable half fence | 48.3% | 69.6% | +21.3 | 23 | |
| Octagon | 45.8% | 66.7% | +20.9 | 39 | |
| Breakable full fence | 52.3% | 73.1% | +20.8 | 26 | |
| Fence and open | 46.3% | 66.7% | +20.4 | 24 | |
| Breakable full fence | 36.0% | 56.0% | +20.0 | 25 |
Every stage type
How much of the data each stage type is| Stage | Matches | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Full fence | 5,340 | 9.97% |
| Breakable full fence | 5,378 | 10.04% |
| Half fence | 5,412 | 10.10% |
| Breakable half fence | 5,391 | 10.07% |
| Low fence | 5,253 | 9.81% |
| Single wall | 5,391 | 10.07% |
| Fence and open | 2,659 | 4.96% |
| Octagon | 5,396 | 10.07% |
| Rectangle | 5,481 | 10.23% |
| Open | 5,272 | 9.84% |
| Not recorded | 2,588 | 4.83% |
Matches counted53,561
Stage groups2
Most affected—
Widest walls gap—
Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23
Who the walls suit
Walled stages against open ones, in pointsBetter in the openBetter behind wallsWithin chance95% interval
Is any of this chance?
The whole cut, tested at onceWalled stages dealt evenly across the rosterχ²=19.6 on 19 df, p=0.419
Matches sharing one stage drawabout 2.0, so a match is not an independent draw
Allowance made for thatevery interval and p-value here widened by ×1.09
Characters whose gap holds up0 of 20 — chance alone would give about 1.0
Matchups whose gap holds up0 of 114 — chance alone would give about 5.7
The roster taken togetherχ²=136.1 on 114 df, p=0.077
Every character, tested
The gap, the range it could be, and the odds of it being nothing| Character | Behind walls | In the open | Gap | 95% interval | p | q (corrected) | Matches | Players |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.1% | 42.6% | +4.5 | +1.0 … +7.9 | 0.011 | 0.157 | 4,349 | 23 | |
| 52.2% | 48.0% | +4.2 | -6.3 … +14.5 | 0.439 | 0.711 | 472 | 13 | |
| 54.9% | 52.6% | +2.3 | -0.1 … +4.6 | 0.060 | 0.399 | 9,335 | 59 | |
| 54.9% | 52.9% | +1.9 | -1.4 … +5.2 | 0.250 | 0.625 | 4,654 | 29 | |
| 52.0% | 50.4% | +1.6 | -0.9 … +4.1 | 0.199 | 0.569 | 8,613 | 61 | |
| 51.6% | 50.0% | +1.6 | -2.5 … +5.6 | 0.456 | 0.711 | 3,181 | 33 | |
| 50.3% | 49.0% | +1.3 | -1.3 … +3.9 | 0.324 | 0.711 | 7,593 | 67 | |
| 46.9% | 46.3% | +0.6 | -3.5 … +4.7 | 0.783 | 0.887 | 3,028 | 47 | |
| 50.2% | 49.6% | +0.5 | -3.7 … +4.8 | 0.808 | 0.887 | 2,825 | 21 | |
| 48.2% | 48.4% | -0.2 | -3.2 … +2.9 | 0.918 | 0.918 | 5,618 | 32 | |
| 46.8% | 47.3% | -0.5 | -5.2 … +4.3 | 0.843 | 0.887 | 2,224 | 41 | |
| 54.0% | 54.6% | -0.6 | -5.1 … +4.0 | 0.799 | 0.887 | 2,397 | 27 | |
| 48.1% | 49.0% | -0.9 | -4.5 … +2.8 | 0.642 | 0.856 | 3,923 | 33 | |
| 47.9% | 48.9% | -0.9 | -4.8 … +3.0 | 0.638 | 0.856 | 3,440 | 33 | |
| 48.6% | 49.5% | -1.0 | -3.6 … +1.6 | 0.462 | 0.711 | 7,511 | 56 | |
| 43.6% | 45.0% | -1.4 | -4.4 … +1.6 | 0.364 | 0.711 | 5,684 | 30 | |
| 48.6% | 50.8% | -2.2 | -5.3 … +1.0 | 0.173 | 0.569 | 5,168 | 44 | |
| 52.4% | 54.8% | -2.4 | -5.7 … +0.8 | 0.145 | 0.569 | 4,861 | 40 | |
| 47.4% | 50.2% | -2.8 | -6.8 … +1.1 | 0.158 | 0.569 | 3,366 | 20 | |
| 50.2% | 53.2% | -3.1 | -5.6 … -0.6 | 0.016 | 0.157 | 8,386 | 76 |
How significance is decided
- Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
- The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
- q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
- Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
- Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.
Every character, every stage
Change from that character's own win rate, in points| Character | Walls | No walls |
|---|---|---|
| +1.4 | -3.0 | |
| +2.8 | -1.4 | |
| +0.9 | -1.3 | |
| +0.9 | -1.0 | |
| +0.5 | -1.1 | |
| +0.4 | -1.1 | |
| +0.4 | -0.9 | |
| -0.2 | -0.8 | |
| +0.2 | -0.3 | |
| +0.1 | +0.2 | |
| +0.4 | +0.9 | |
| -0.5 | +0.1 | |
| -0.3 | +0.5 | |
| -0.3 | +0.6 | |
| -0.2 | +0.8 | |
| -0.8 | +0.6 | |
| -0.7 | +1.5 | |
| -0.9 | +1.5 | |
| -0.7 | +2.2 | |
| -1.1 | +2.0 |
Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage
The widest matchup gaps
One matchup behind walls against the same matchup in the open, widest first — none of them survives correction| Matchup | Behind walls | In the open | Gap | 95% interval | p | q (corrected) | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.1% | 33.3% | +19.7 | +2.8 … +35.0 | 0.023 | 0.481 | 164 | |
| 59.1% | 39.7% | +19.4 | +3.3 … +34.1 | 0.018 | 0.481 | 195 | |
| 48.5% | 31.6% | +16.9 | +4.6 … +28.2 | 0.007 | 0.412 | 317 | |
| 47.8% | 31.1% | +16.7 | -0.0 … +31.6 | 0.051 | 0.793 | 176 | |
| 57.6% | 42.0% | +15.6 | -0.6 … +30.8 | 0.059 | 0.793 | 187 | |
| 52.3% | 38.6% | +13.7 | -4.4 … +30.4 | 0.140 | 0.862 | 145 | |
| 60.1% | 47.2% | +12.9 | +1.6 … +23.9 | 0.025 | 0.481 | 418 | |
| 56.6% | 43.9% | +12.7 | +1.8 … +23.1 | 0.022 | 0.481 | 429 | |
| 55.2% | 42.6% | +12.6 | +4.9 … +20.0 | 0.001 | 0.140 | 933 | |
| 53.0% | 41.1% | +11.9 | -4.0 … +27.0 | 0.144 | 0.862 | 188 | |
| 56.5% | 45.4% | +11.2 | -2.9 … +24.8 | 0.122 | 0.862 | 254 | |
| 48.8% | 37.7% | +11.1 | -6.9 … +27.9 | 0.231 | 0.862 | 141 | |
| 55.2% | 44.4% | +10.7 | -3.1 … +24.0 | 0.130 | 0.862 | 304 | |
| 49.6% | 39.1% | +10.6 | -3.9 … +24.3 | 0.153 | 0.862 | 230 | |
| 49.1% | 39.4% | +9.7 | -6.8 … +25.2 | 0.250 | 0.862 | 178 | |
| 58.0% | 48.8% | +9.2 | -4.9 … +22.9 | 0.204 | 0.862 | 255 | |
| 62.8% | 53.9% | +9.0 | -7.2 … +24.9 | 0.282 | 0.862 | 178 | |
| 68.3% | 59.8% | +8.6 | -4.9 … +22.2 | 0.216 | 0.862 | 248 | |
| 50.3% | 42.4% | +7.9 | -6.2 … +21.4 | 0.272 | 0.862 | 260 | |
| 52.1% | 44.4% | +7.8 | -4.1 … +19.2 | 0.200 | 0.862 | 362 | |
| 46.6% | 38.9% | +7.7 | -4.8 … +19.6 | 0.227 | 0.862 | 319 | |
| 58.7% | 51.2% | +7.5 | -2.1 … +17.1 | 0.125 | 0.862 | 586 | |
| 53.8% | 46.3% | +7.5 | -9.0 … +23.4 | 0.381 | 0.862 | 227 | |
| 53.6% | 46.5% | +7.2 | -0.4 … +14.6 | 0.063 | 0.793 | 987 |
Every stage type
How much of the data each stage type is| Stage | Matches | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Walls | 32,398 | 60.49% |
| No walls | 15,916 | 29.72% |
| Not recorded | 2,588 | 4.83% |
