Virtua Fighter 5 REVO · v1.10 · Character Matchup Winrates
Dural vs Shun
Dural vs Shun in Virtua Fighter 5 REVO v1.10: Dural wins 56.7% of 804 decided matches (Low, mid and high combined, 2026/03/26 – 2026/10/18). Stage by stage, 0 of 5 tested stage gaps survive correction.
Where it was fought
Dural's win rate on each stage, against this matchup everywhere| Stage | Gap from usual | Win % | Change | p | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low fence | 66.7% | +9.9 | 0.074 | 72 · | |
| Half fence | 60.3% | +3.5 | 0.520 | 73 · | |
| Single wall | 57.5% | +0.7 | 0.879 | 94 | |
| Fence and open | 57.4% | +0.7 | 0.915 | 54 · | |
| Full fence | 57.1% | +0.4 | 0.928 | 98 | |
| Open | 57.0% | +0.3 | 0.959 | 86 | |
| Breakable half fence | 55.7% | -1.1 | 0.814 | 106 | |
| Rectangle | 53.7% | -3.0 | 0.525 | 95 | |
| Breakable full fence | 53.6% | -3.1 | 0.588 | 69 · | |
| Octagon | 46.9% | -9.8 | 0.252 | 32 · |
Matchups with a stage played at least 80 times: 181. With a stage that survives correction: 13. Expected from chance alone: about 9.1.
Stage against stage
Dural's win rate on the row's stage, minus the same on the column'sAll ten shapes at once: chi-square 5.24 on 9 df, p 0.813
| Stage | Full | Break. full | Half | Break. half | Low | Wall | Mixed | Open | Rect | Oct |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full fence | 57.1%98 | +3.50.652 | -3.10.681 | +1.50.831 | -9.50.208 | -0.30.966 | -0.30.975 | +0.20.982 | +3.50.629 | +10.30.311 |
| Breakable full fence | -3.50.652 | 53.6%69 | -6.70.424 | -2.00.791 | -13.10.114 | -3.80.627 | -3.80.675 | -3.40.676 | -0.10.994 | +6.70.528 |
| Half fence | +3.10.681 | +6.70.424 | 60.3%73 | +4.60.539 | -6.40.424 | +2.80.713 | +2.90.745 | +3.30.674 | +6.60.393 | +13.40.203 |
| Breakable half fence | -1.50.831 | +2.00.791 | -4.60.539 | 55.7%106 | -11.00.141 | -1.80.799 | -1.80.833 | -1.30.855 | +2.00.779 | +8.80.382 |
| Low fence | +9.50.208 | +13.10.114 | +6.40.424 | +11.00.141 | 66.7%72 | +9.20.226 | +9.30.288 | +9.70.213 | +13.00.091 | +19.80.057 |
| Single wall | +0.30.966 | +3.80.627 | -2.80.713 | +1.80.799 | -9.20.226 | 57.5%94 | +0.00.996 | +0.50.949 | +3.80.603 | +10.60.299 |
| Fence and open | +0.30.975 | +3.80.675 | -2.90.745 | +1.80.833 | -9.30.288 | -0.00.996 | 57.4%54 | +0.40.960 | +3.70.661 | +10.50.344 |
| Open | -0.20.982 | +3.40.676 | -3.30.674 | +1.30.855 | -9.70.213 | -0.50.949 | -0.40.960 | 57.0%86 | +3.30.656 | +10.10.327 |
| Rectangle | -3.50.629 | +0.10.994 | -6.60.393 | -2.00.779 | -13.00.091 | -3.80.603 | -3.70.661 | -3.30.656 | 53.7%95 | +6.80.505 |
| Octagon | -10.30.311 | -6.70.528 | -13.40.203 | -8.80.382 | -19.80.057 | -10.60.299 | -10.50.344 | -10.10.327 | -6.80.505 | 46.9%32 |
Matchups with two stages each played at least 80 times: 180. With a stage-against-stage difference that survives correction: 12. Expected from chance alone: about 9.0.
How significance is decided
- Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
- The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
- q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
- Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
- Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.
Where it was fought
Dural's win rate on each stage, against this matchup everywhere| Stage | Gap from usual | Win % | Change | p | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Octagon | 81.8% | +20.8 | 0.148 | 11 · | |
| Low fence | 69.6% | +8.6 | 0.378 | 23 · | |
| Breakable half fence | 66.7% | +5.7 | 0.499 | 30 · | |
| Open | 66.7% | +5.7 | 0.475 | 33 · | |
| Single wall | 66.7% | +5.7 | 0.550 | 24 · | |
| Rectangle | 58.6% | -2.4 | 0.780 | 29 · | |
| Full fence | 55.9% | -5.1 | 0.511 | 34 · | |
| Breakable full fence | 55.6% | -5.4 | 0.540 | 27 · | |
| Fence and open | 53.3% | -7.7 | 0.530 | 15 · | |
| Half fence | 51.9% | -9.2 | 0.303 | 27 · |
No stage in this matchup has been played 80 times yet, so none is tested or ranked.
Matchups with a stage played at least 80 times: 158. With a stage that survives correction: 14. Expected from chance alone: about 7.9.
Stage against stage
Dural's win rate on the row's stage, minus the same on the column'sAll ten shapes at once: chi-square 5.98 on 9 df, p 0.742
| Stage | Full | Break. full | Half | Break. half | Low | Wall | Mixed | Open | Rect | Oct |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full fence | 55.9%34 | +0.30.980 | +4.00.754 | -10.80.378 | -13.70.298 | -10.80.408 | +2.50.869 | -10.80.365 | -2.70.827 | -25.90.123 |
| Breakable full fence | -0.30.980 | 55.6%27 | +3.70.785 | -11.10.390 | -14.00.309 | -11.10.417 | +2.20.890 | -11.10.379 | -3.10.817 | -26.30.128 |
| Half fence | -4.00.754 | -3.70.785 | 51.9%27 | -14.80.255 | -17.70.203 | -14.80.283 | -1.50.927 | -14.80.244 | -6.80.611 | -30.00.087 |
| Breakable half fence | +10.80.378 | +11.10.390 | +14.80.255 | 66.7%30 | -2.90.823 | +0.01.000 | +13.30.384 | +0.01.000 | +8.10.523 | -15.20.345 |
| Low fence | +13.70.298 | +14.00.309 | +17.70.203 | +2.90.823 | 69.6%23 | +2.90.831 | +16.20.311 | +2.90.819 | +10.90.416 | -12.20.449 |
| Single wall | +10.80.408 | +11.10.417 | +14.80.283 | -0.01.000 | -2.90.831 | 66.7%24 | +13.30.405 | +0.01.000 | +8.10.547 | -15.20.357 |
| Fence and open | -2.50.869 | -2.20.890 | +1.50.927 | -13.30.384 | -16.20.311 | -13.30.405 | 53.3%15 | -13.30.376 | -5.30.737 | -28.50.131 |
| Open | +10.80.365 | +11.10.379 | +14.80.244 | -0.01.000 | -2.90.819 | -0.01.000 | +13.30.376 | 66.7%33 | +8.10.513 | -15.20.340 |
| Rectangle | +2.70.827 | +3.10.817 | +6.80.611 | -8.10.523 | -10.90.416 | -8.10.547 | +5.30.737 | -8.10.513 | 58.6%29 | -23.20.170 |
| Octagon | +25.90.123 | +26.30.128 | +30.00.087 | +15.20.345 | +12.20.449 | +15.20.357 | +28.50.131 | +15.20.340 | +23.20.170 | 81.8%11 |
Matchups with two stages each played at least 80 times: 152. With a stage-against-stage difference that survives correction: 11. Expected from chance alone: about 7.6.
How significance is decided
- Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
- The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
- q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
- Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
- Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.
Where it was fought
Dural's win rate on each stage, against this matchup everywhere| Stage | Gap from usual | Win % | Change | p | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half fence | 65.2% | +10.7 | 0.128 | 46 · | |
| Low fence | 64.6% | +10.1 | 0.142 | 48 · | |
| Fence and open | 61.1% | +6.6 | 0.411 | 36 · | |
| Full fence | 57.1% | +2.6 | 0.657 | 63 · | |
| Breakable full fence | 55.6% | +1.0 | 0.898 | 36 · | |
| Single wall | 53.6% | -0.9 | 0.871 | 69 · | |
| Rectangle | 51.5% | -3.0 | 0.599 | 66 · | |
| Breakable half fence | 50.7% | -3.9 | 0.469 | 75 · | |
| Open | 49.0% | -5.5 | 0.406 | 51 · | |
| Octagon | 28.6% | -26.0 | 0.015 | 21 · |
No stage in this matchup has been played 80 times yet, so none is tested or ranked.
Matchups with a stage played at least 80 times: 157. With a stage that survives correction: 11. Expected from chance alone: about 7.9.
Stage against stage
Dural's win rate on the row's stage, minus the same on the column'sAll ten shapes at once: chi-square 11.94 on 9 df, p 0.217
| Stage | Full | Break. full | Half | Break. half | Low | Wall | Mixed | Open | Rect | Oct |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full fence | 57.1%63 | +1.60.878 | -8.10.394 | +6.50.447 | -7.40.427 | +3.50.685 | -4.00.700 | +8.10.387 | +5.60.521 | +28.60.023 |
| Breakable full fence | -1.60.878 | 55.6%36 | -9.70.373 | +4.90.629 | -9.00.402 | +1.90.850 | -5.50.633 | +6.50.548 | +4.00.696 | +27.00.048 |
| Half fence | +8.10.394 | +9.70.373 | 65.2%46 | +14.60.117 | +0.60.949 | +11.60.217 | +4.10.702 | +16.20.108 | +13.70.149 | +36.60.005 |
| Breakable half fence | -6.50.447 | -4.90.629 | -14.60.117 | 50.7%75 | -13.90.129 | -3.00.723 | -10.40.301 | +1.60.856 | -0.80.920 | +22.10.072 |
| Low fence | +7.40.427 | +9.00.402 | -0.60.949 | +13.90.129 | 64.6%48 | +11.00.237 | +3.50.744 | +15.60.118 | +13.10.164 | +36.00.006 |
| Single wall | -3.50.685 | -1.90.850 | -11.60.217 | +3.00.723 | -11.00.237 | 53.6%69 | -7.50.463 | +4.60.618 | +2.10.806 | +25.10.044 |
| Fence and open | +4.00.700 | +5.50.633 | -4.10.702 | +10.40.301 | -3.50.744 | +7.50.463 | 61.1%36 | +12.10.265 | +9.60.352 | +32.50.018 |
| Open | -8.10.387 | -6.50.548 | -16.20.108 | -1.60.856 | -15.60.118 | -4.60.618 | -12.10.265 | 49.0%51 | -2.50.789 | +20.40.111 |
| Rectangle | -5.60.521 | -4.00.696 | -13.70.149 | +0.80.920 | -13.10.164 | -2.10.806 | -9.60.352 | +2.50.789 | 51.5%66 | +22.90.066 |
| Octagon | -28.60.023 | -27.00.048 | -36.60.005 | -22.10.072 | -36.00.006 | -25.10.044 | -32.50.018 | -20.40.111 | -22.90.066 | 28.6%21 |
Matchups with two stages each played at least 80 times: 152. With a stage-against-stage difference that survives correction: 8. Expected from chance alone: about 7.6.
How significance is decided
- Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
- The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
- q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
- Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
- Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.
Where it was fought
Dural's win rate on each stage, against this matchup everywhere| Stage | Gap from usual | Win % | Change | p | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breakable half fence | 100.0% | +40.0 | 0.398 | 1 · | |
| Full fence | 100.0% | +40.0 | 0.398 | 1 · | |
| Low fence | 100.0% | +40.0 | 0.398 | 1 · | |
| Open | 100.0% | +40.0 | 0.215 | 2 · | |
| Single wall | 100.0% | +40.0 | 0.398 | 1 · | |
| Breakable full fence | 33.3% | -26.7 | 0.085 | 6 · | |
| Fence and open | 33.3% | -26.7 | 0.292 | 3 · |
No stage in this matchup has been played 80 times yet, so none is tested or ranked.
Matchups with a stage played at least 80 times: 23. With a stage that survives correction: 1. Expected from chance alone: about 1.2.
Stage against stage
Dural's win rate on the row's stage, minus the same on the column'sAll ten shapes at once: chi-square 6.67 on 6 df, p 0.353
| Stage | Full | Break. full | Break. half | Low | Wall | Mixed | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full fence | 100.0%1 | +66.70.212 | +0.01.000 | +0.01.000 | +0.01.000 | +66.70.248 | +0.01.000 |
| Breakable full fence | -66.70.212 | 33.3%6 | -66.70.212 | -66.70.212 | -66.70.212 | +0.01.000 | -66.70.102 |
| Breakable half fence | -0.01.000 | +66.70.212 | 100.0%1 | +0.01.000 | +0.01.000 | +66.70.248 | +0.01.000 |
| Low fence | -0.01.000 | +66.70.212 | -0.01.000 | 100.0%1 | +0.01.000 | +66.70.248 | +0.01.000 |
| Single wall | -0.01.000 | +66.70.212 | -0.01.000 | -0.01.000 | 100.0%1 | +66.70.248 | +0.01.000 |
| Fence and open | -66.70.248 | -0.01.000 | -66.70.248 | -66.70.248 | -66.70.248 | 33.3%3 | -66.70.136 |
| Open | -0.01.000 | +66.70.102 | -0.01.000 | -0.01.000 | -0.01.000 | +66.70.136 | 100.0%2 |
Matchups with two stages each played at least 80 times: 20. With a stage-against-stage difference that survives correction: 2. Expected from chance alone: about 1.0.
How significance is decided
- Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
- The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
- q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
- Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
- Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.
