The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate49.4%

Standing#16 of 19 · tier C

Pick rate6.9%

Most picked#3 of 19

Matches counted110,139

Unique players960

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/10/18

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Aoi	53.22%	3,724	3,273	6,997
Akira	52.31%	7,233	6,595	13,828
Pai	50.64%	3,459	3,372	6,831
Shun	50.50%	3,169	3,106	6,275
Lion	50.44%	2,823	2,774	5,597
Sarah	50.33%	3,442	3,397	6,839
Lei Fei	50.17%	1,915	1,902	3,817
Dural	50.00%	419	419	838
Taka	49.40%	1,075	1,101	2,176
Jacky	49.29%	5,783	5,949	11,732
Goh	48.95%	2,966	3,093	6,059
El Blaze	48.22%	2,161	2,321	4,482
Jeffry	47.95%	3,337	3,622	6,959
Lau	47.47%	2,656	2,939	5,595
Kage	47.33%	2,788	3,103	5,891
Vanessa	46.85%	1,819	2,064	3,883
Brad	46.13%	2,092	2,443	4,535
Jean	45.88%	2,668	3,147	5,815
Eileen	44.32%	882	1,108	1,990

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Match WP

WP = win probability. Change from this character's own match win rate, in points

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Aoi53.2%	52	52	54	55	54	52	54	53	52	54
Akira52.3%	49	51	52	52	57	54	52	51	53	54
Pai50.6%	51	52	51	51	53	47	48	48	54	48
Shun50.5%	50	48	54	48	50	51	51	48	54	50
Lion50.4%	49	51	50	47	53	51	50	51	50	52
Sarah50.3%	52	50	47	49	50	56	50	46	52	54
Lei Fei50.2%	46	47	48	47	54	52	49	52	52	51
Dural50.0%	52	51	49	47	42	54	56	54	42	52
Taka49.4%	50	53	46	47	48	47	54	50	50	49
Jacky49.3%	49	50	49	48	48	51	50	48	50	51
Goh49.0%	46	48	49	51	48	46	49	50	51	50
El Blaze48.2%	46	45	45	46	51	47	48	52	48	50
Jeffry48.0%	45	49	49	48	49	49	47	46	47	47
Lau47.5%	48	45	49	45	53	48	47	45	43	51
Kage47.3%	47	49	46	48	45	47	43	50	48	49
Vanessa46.9%	47	50	48	43	45	46	44	46	49	49
Brad46.1%	46	47	45	44	43	48	48	44	44	51
Jean45.9%	43	44	45	43	47	46	50	48	47	50
Eileen44.3%	45	45	43	46	43	44	39	43	46	45

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls-1.4 pts behind walls (95% interval -2.3 to -0.5); holds up against the 20 characters tested, q=0.038

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Aoi53.2%	53	53
Akira52.3%	51	55
Pai50.6%	51	50
Shun50.5%	50	50
Lion50.4%	50	52
Sarah50.3%	49	53
Lei Fei50.2%	49	52
Dural50.0%	49	49
Taka49.4%	49	48
Jacky49.3%	49	50
Goh49.0%	49	48
El Blaze48.2%	47	49
Jeffry48.0%	47	48
Lau47.5%	46	51
Kage47.3%	48	47
Vanessa46.9%	47	47
Brad46.1%	45	48
Jean45.9%	45	48
Eileen44.3%	45	44

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round WP

WP = win probability. Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Aoi51.7%	51	51	52	53	52	51	52	52	51	52
Akira51.3%	49	51	51	51	53	52	51	51	51	52
Shun50.9%	51	49	53	49	50	51	51	50	52	50
Pai50.6%	51	51	51	51	52	49	50	49	53	50
Lion50.5%	50	51	50	48	52	52	50	50	51	51
Lei Fei50.1%	48	49	49	49	52	51	49	51	51	50
Sarah50.1%	51	50	48	49	50	53	50	48	50	52
Taka49.9%	49	51	48	50	49	48	54	50	50	51
Jacky49.7%	49	50	50	49	49	51	50	49	50	50
Dural49.5%	49	51	49	49	46	51	53	51	46	51
Goh49.4%	48	49	50	50	49	48	49	50	51	50
El Blaze48.9%	48	47	48	47	50	49	49	51	49	50
Jeffry48.8%	48	48	50	48	50	49	48	48	48	48
Lau48.5%	49	48	49	47	51	49	48	47	47	50
Kage48.3%	49	49	48	49	47	48	44	49	48	49
Vanessa48.1%	48	50	48	47	48	48	47	48	49	49
Brad48.0%	47	48	47	48	47	49	48	47	47	50
Jean47.8%	46	47	48	46	49	48	49	48	48	50
Eileen46.9%	47	48	45	48	48	47	44	47	48	47

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls-0.8 pts behind walls (95% interval -1.3 to -0.4); holds up against the 20 characters tested, q=0.008

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Aoi51.7%	52	52
Akira51.3%	51	52
Shun50.9%	51	51
Pai50.6%	51	50
Lion50.5%	50	52
Lei Fei50.1%	49	51
Sarah50.1%	49	52
Taka49.9%	50	49
Jacky49.7%	50	50
Dural49.5%	49	49
Goh49.4%	50	49
El Blaze48.9%	48	50
Jeffry48.8%	48	49
Lau48.5%	48	50
Kage48.3%	49	48
Vanessa48.1%	48	48
Brad48.0%	47	49
Jean47.8%	47	49
Eileen46.9%	47	47

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	6.14%	5	55,449
North America	9.31%	2	26,240
South America	7.86%	3	25,081
Europe	6.82%	5	2,948
Oceania	17.90%	1	1,298
Middle East	1.72%	4	36
Not recorded	4.77%	12	7,829

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate50.5%

Standing#10 of 19 · tier B

Pick rate8.3%

Most picked#3 of 19

Matches counted60,148

Unique players754

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/10/18

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Aoi	55.35%	2,600	2,097	4,697
Akira	53.95%	4,361	3,722	8,083
Lion	52.71%	1,518	1,362	2,880
Pai	52.00%	2,220	2,049	4,269
Lei Fei	51.76%	883	823	1,706
Sarah	51.49%	2,145	2,021	4,166
Shun	51.34%	1,900	1,801	3,701
Taka	50.94%	625	602	1,227
Jacky	49.73%	3,186	3,220	6,406
El Blaze	49.46%	1,238	1,265	2,503
Goh	49.23%	1,689	1,742	3,431
Kage	49.18%	1,229	1,270	2,499
Lau	47.45%	1,164	1,289	2,453
Vanessa	47.39%	973	1,080	2,053
Jeffry	47.04%	1,835	2,066	3,901
Eileen	45.66%	547	651	1,198
Brad	45.62%	859	1,024	1,883
Jean	45.50%	1,238	1,483	2,721
Dural	44.20%	164	207	371

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Match WP

WP = win probability. Change from this character's own match win rate, in points

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Aoi55.4%	53	53	57	58	54	55	58	56	54	56
Akira54.0%	50	53	54	52	58	58	52	52	53	56
Lion52.7%	51	52	51	47	58	53	58	54	54	51
Pai52.0%	51	55	52	52	55	48	48	48	57	49
Lei Fei51.8%	50	48	50	48	58	55	49	53	52	52
Sarah51.5%	51	51	48	50	52	56	54	48	54	55
Shun51.3%	48	50	54	50	51	52	50	47	56	53
Taka50.9%	49	53	48	46	51	50	62	48	52	53
Jacky49.7%	48	52	49	49	47	51	48	51	51	52
El Blaze49.5%	50	48	46	47	49	45	54	54	48	55
Goh49.2%	44	46	48	51	49	50	50	50	53	51
Kage49.2%	48	52	46	49	48	52	41	54	49	51
Lau47.5%	50	46	47	46	51	50	43	45	41	57
Vanessa47.4%	51	51	46	42	49	47	45	46	50	50
Jeffry47.0%	42	47	49	49	48	49	47	45	47	47
Eileen45.7%	47	42	45	43	50	45	44	44	47	47
Brad45.6%	40	42	46	46	39	52	47	50	44	51
Jean45.5%	44	41	46	43	46	50	50	51	46	47
Dural44.2%	52	42	31	31	46	51	60	41	39	53

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls-2.1 pts behind walls (95% interval -3.2 to -0.9); holds up against the 20 characters tested, q=0.009

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Aoi55.4%	55	55
Akira54.0%	52	57
Lion52.7%	52	54
Pai52.0%	53	51
Lei Fei51.8%	50	55
Sarah51.5%	50	55
Shun51.3%	51	52
Taka50.9%	49	52
Jacky49.7%	50	50
El Blaze49.5%	49	50
Goh49.2%	49	50
Kage49.2%	50	50
Lau47.5%	46	53
Vanessa47.4%	48	49
Jeffry47.0%	46	48
Eileen45.7%	45	48
Brad45.6%	45	47
Jean45.5%	45	47
Dural44.2%	40	51

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round WP

WP = win probability. Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Aoi52.7%	51	51	54	55	52	53	54	53	52	54
Akira52.1%	49	52	52	51	54	54	51	51	51	53
Lion51.6%	51	52	51	49	55	53	54	52	52	51
Shun51.4%	50	50	53	51	51	52	51	49	53	52
Pai51.3%	51	52	51	51	53	49	50	49	55	50
Taka50.9%	50	50	48	49	52	49	57	50	51	54
Lei Fei50.8%	50	50	49	50	53	52	49	51	50	51
Sarah50.7%	50	50	49	49	50	54	52	49	52	52
Jacky49.9%	49	51	50	49	48	51	49	50	51	51
Goh49.6%	47	48	50	50	49	49	51	50	51	51
El Blaze49.6%	49	49	49	48	49	48	52	52	48	52
Kage49.4%	50	51	47	50	49	51	43	51	50	50
Lau48.5%	50	48	49	47	50	51	46	47	46	53
Vanessa48.4%	51	50	48	45	50	48	47	49	49	49
Jeffry48.0%	46	47	49	48	49	49	48	47	48	48
Brad48.0%	45	45	47	49	46	52	48	50	47	52
Jean47.6%	47	44	48	46	47	50	51	49	49	49
Eileen47.5%	48	46	46	48	51	48	45	48	47	49
Dural46.0%	49	46	39	37	46	49	54	45	45	50

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls-1.2 pts behind walls (95% interval -1.8 to -0.6); holds up against the 20 characters tested, q=0.002

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Aoi52.7%	53	53
Akira52.1%	51	54
Lion51.6%	51	53
Shun51.4%	51	52
Pai51.3%	52	51
Taka50.9%	50	52
Lei Fei50.8%	50	52
Sarah50.7%	50	52
Jacky49.9%	50	50
Goh49.6%	49	50
El Blaze49.6%	49	50
Kage49.4%	50	50
Lau48.5%	48	51
Vanessa48.4%	49	49
Jeffry48.0%	48	49
Brad48.0%	47	50
Jean47.6%	47	49
Eileen47.5%	47	49
Dural46.0%	44	49

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	6.25%	6	17,033
North America	11.12%	2	21,291
South America	9.76%	2	17,960
Europe	9.55%	2	2,275
Oceania	18.79%	1	1,298
Middle East	1.11%	3	12
Not recorded	5.22%	10	5,997

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate48.1%

Standing#19 of 19 · tier D

Pick rate6.1%

Most picked#4 of 19

Matches counted45,492

Unique players325

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/10/18

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Dural	54.32%	245	206	451
Akira	50.50%	2,689	2,636	5,325
Shun	50.02%	1,162	1,161	2,323
Lei Fei	49.04%	946	983	1,929
Aoi	48.92%	1,085	1,133	2,218
Goh	48.76%	1,224	1,286	2,510
Jeffry	48.76%	1,414	1,486	2,900
Jacky	48.52%	2,364	2,508	4,872
Sarah	48.51%	1,187	1,260	2,447
Pai	47.83%	1,123	1,225	2,348
El Blaze	47.44%	834	924	1,758
Lau	47.35%	1,295	1,440	2,735
Taka	47.24%	394	440	834
Lion	47.23%	1,126	1,258	2,384
Brad	46.36%	1,062	1,229	2,291
Kage	46.36%	1,368	1,583	2,951
Jean	46.11%	1,374	1,606	2,980
Vanessa	45.45%	719	863	1,582
Eileen	41.44%	271	383	654

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Match WP

WP = win probability. Change from this character's own match win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Dural54.3%	52	59	63	55	38	58	50	65	48	51
Akira50.5%	49	48	48	52	54	49	53	49	54	51
Shun50.0%	53	46	55	44	50	49	55	49	53	46
Lei Fei49.0%	42	44	48	47	52	51	49	51	54	49
Aoi48.9%	49	49	49	50	55	47	42	47	46	48
Goh48.8%	50	51	49	51	46	44	46	50	50	49
Jeffry48.8%	49	52	49	47	51	48	47	48	47	46
Jacky48.5%	49	47	49	48	48	51	52	45	50	49
Sarah48.5%	53	47	45	48	49	55	44	43	48	51
Pai47.8%	51	47	49	48	49	48	49	47	46	46
El Blaze47.4%	42	44	48	45	54	50	39	49	50	46
Lau47.4%	46	46	51	43	54	45	47	47	46	48
Taka47.2%	47	53	42	48	49	42	44	53	49	43
Lion47.2%	44	50	48	46	47	46	40	47	48	52
Brad46.4%	50	52	44	42	46	45	50	40	42	52
Kage46.4%	47	45	46	46	44	42	47	48	49	48
Jean46.1%	42	48	44	42	49	42	50	46	47	52
Vanessa45.5%	42	48	49	43	41	47	47	46	45	48
Eileen41.4%	43	50	41	44	35	42	28	43	47	39

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls-0.7 pts behind walls (95% interval -1.9 to +0.5); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.552

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Dural54.3%	57	48
Akira50.5%	50	51
Shun50.0%	50	48
Lei Fei49.0%	47	51
Aoi48.9%	48	50
Goh48.8%	50	46
Jeffry48.8%	49	48
Jacky48.5%	48	49
Sarah48.5%	47	52
Pai47.8%	48	47
El Blaze47.4%	46	50
Lau47.4%	47	49
Taka47.2%	49	45
Lion47.2%	47	48
Brad46.4%	45	48
Kage46.4%	47	45
Jean46.1%	45	48
Vanessa45.5%	45	45
Eileen41.4%	45	39

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round WP

WP = win probability. Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Dural52.3%	50	54	58	55	45	53	49	55	48	51
Akira50.4%	50	50	49	51	52	50	51	51	52	50
Shun50.3%	52	48	53	47	50	50	53	51	52	48
Aoi49.6%	50	50	49	50	53	49	47	49	49	49
Lei Fei49.6%	46	48	49	49	51	50	49	51	53	49
Jeffry49.5%	50	51	50	49	51	49	48	48	48	48
Pai49.3%	51	48	50	50	50	50	50	48	48	50
Jacky49.3%	50	49	50	49	49	50	51	48	49	49
Goh49.2%	50	51	49	50	48	47	47	49	51	49
Sarah49.2%	51	48	48	48	49	53	47	47	48	51
Lion48.9%	47	50	50	48	48	49	45	49	50	51
El Blaze48.5%	46	47	49	45	52	50	43	50	50	47
Taka48.5%	48	53	47	50	48	45	49	51	49	46
Lau48.2%	48	48	50	45	52	48	48	48	48	48
Brad48.0%	49	51	47	47	49	46	49	45	47	50
Jean47.9%	46	49	47	47	50	47	48	47	48	50
Kage47.9%	48	48	48	49	46	46	46	49	47	49
Vanessa47.5%	45	49	48	47	45	50	49	47	47	48
Eileen45.9%	45	50	45	45	45	46	40	47	50	45

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls-0.4 pts behind walls (95% interval -1.0 to +0.2); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.537

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Dural52.3%	54	49
Akira50.4%	50	51
Shun50.3%	50	49
Aoi49.6%	49	50
Lei Fei49.6%	49	50
Jeffry49.5%	49	50
Pai49.3%	49	50
Jacky49.3%	49	49
Goh49.2%	50	48
Sarah49.2%	48	51
Lion48.9%	49	50
El Blaze48.5%	48	50
Taka48.5%	49	46
Lau48.2%	48	49
Brad48.0%	47	48
Jean47.9%	47	49
Kage47.9%	48	47
Vanessa47.5%	47	48
Eileen45.9%	47	45

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	6.70%	3	34,100
South America	5.28%	8	7,103
North America	5.70%	6	4,844
Europe	3.51%	11	584
Middle East	2.36%	3	24
Oceania	0.00%	19	0
Not recorded	3.91%	9	1,765

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate47.9%

Standing#14 of 19 · tier C

Pick rate3.4%

Most picked#13 of 19

Matches counted4,499

Unique players35

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/10/18

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Dural	62.50%	10	6	16
Jeffry	55.70%	88	70	158
Pai	54.21%	116	98	214
Lion	53.75%	179	154	333
Jacky	51.32%	233	221	454
Vanessa	51.21%	127	121	248
Jean	49.12%	56	58	114
Taka	48.70%	56	59	115
Sarah	48.67%	110	116	226
Lau	48.40%	197	210	407
Aoi	47.56%	39	43	82
Brad	47.37%	171	190	361
Lei Fei	47.25%	86	96	182
Eileen	46.38%	64	74	138
Goh	44.92%	53	65	118
Akira	43.57%	183	237	420
Kage	43.31%	191	250	441
Shun	42.63%	107	144	251
El Blaze	40.27%	89	132	221

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Match WP

WP = win probability. Change from this character's own match win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Dural62.5%	·	·	·	67	67	·	100	100	43	·
Jeffry55.7%	40	60	50	67	53	70	50	46	55	58
Pai54.2%	43	52	60	67	57	43	33	47	77	65
Lion53.8%	67	47	53	50	56	58	42	52	38	59
Jacky51.3%	57	49	52	29	64	58	63	44	47	51
Vanessa51.2%	52	57	67	52	46	36	14	60	61	48
Jean49.1%	60	36	43	45	40	70	43	64	48	58
Taka48.7%	83	55	44	62	20	40	50	55	40	43
Sarah48.7%	64	59	38	54	30	48	43	40	52	62
Lau48.4%	51	29	48	58	57	55	65	40	43	42
Aoi47.6%	54	47	75	25	22	60	0	38	0	71
Brad47.4%	47	45	41	48	45	58	50	36	56	45
Lei Fei47.2%	50	60	44	40	36	20	100	62	43	55
Eileen46.4%	38	50	43	69	14	47	42	43	36	57
Goh44.9%	31	44	53	50	64	18	60	62	47	42
Akira43.6%	41	44	48	43	50	48	29	41	48	40
Kage43.3%	40	55	47	49	35	46	33	41	37	43
Shun42.6%	50	13	48	44	41	45	38	52	37	28
El Blaze40.3%	38	33	26	50	44	50	50	44	45	37

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls-0.7 pts behind walls (95% interval -4.5 to +3.0); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.829

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Dural62.5%	55	67
Jeffry55.7%	52	61
Pai54.2%	57	53
Lion53.8%	52	58
Jacky51.3%	47	57
Vanessa51.2%	57	43
Jean49.1%	48	56
Taka48.7%	56	34
Sarah48.7%	50	45
Lau48.4%	46	51
Aoi47.6%	47	52
Brad47.4%	45	49
Lei Fei47.2%	48	40
Eileen46.4%	47	44
Goh44.9%	47	38
Akira43.6%	44	46
Kage43.3%	44	42
Shun42.6%	43	37
El Blaze40.3%	38	43

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round WP

WP = win probability. Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Jeffry53.5%	49	55	49	59	57	62	53	48	50	53
Pai52.5%	45	52	55	60	54	47	46	48	65	57
Dural52.3%	·	·	·	54	60	·	75	60	41	·
Lion51.9%	58	48	53	49	53	57	49	49	45	53
Vanessa50.1%	50	52	57	51	49	37	33	54	56	51
Jacky50.0%	53	51	51	38	54	55	57	44	48	49
Taka49.8%	57	54	51	60	31	48	54	53	46	43
Aoi49.7%	50	53	59	38	38	59	40	42	25	55
Lau49.6%	49	43	49	59	54	51	54	46	47	46
Goh49.2%	47	53	53	46	56	38	55	59	47	48
Jean48.9%	57	39	48	49	46	55	48	55	46	56
Lei Fei48.4%	50	53	44	45	47	38	75	57	47	51
Sarah48.2%	59	54	45	46	42	47	43	44	48	56
Shun47.9%	52	35	51	51	49	50	41	49	46	42
Brad47.9%	46	48	47	47	46	54	49	44	52	45
Akira47.0%	45	49	50	47	49	49	41	46	49	45
Eileen46.9%	46	49	42	57	20	50	49	45	44	48
Kage45.7%	47	52	48	48	43	46	38	43	41	47
El Blaze44.2%	44	41	38	47	49	51	48	44	47	40

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls-0.3 pts behind walls (95% interval -2.3 to +1.6); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.771

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Jeffry53.5%	51	57
Pai52.5%	54	52
Dural52.3%	47	60
Lion51.9%	51	54
Vanessa50.1%	53	46
Jacky50.0%	48	52
Taka49.8%	53	42
Aoi49.7%	49	52
Lau49.6%	49	50
Goh49.2%	50	46
Jean48.9%	48	52
Lei Fei48.4%	48	46
Sarah48.2%	49	48
Shun47.9%	48	46
Brad47.9%	47	48
Akira47.0%	48	48
Eileen46.9%	47	44
Kage45.7%	46	46
El Blaze44.2%	43	46

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	3.55%	13	4,316
North America	1.95%	13	105
Europe	3.20%	11	89
South America	2.52%	7	18
Not recorded	1.61%	12	67

Wolf

Against the roster

Stage Impact To Match WP

Each matchup, stage by stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Stage Impact To Round WP

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Where they are played

Against the roster

Stage Impact To Match WP

Each matchup, stage by stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Stage Impact To Round WP

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Where they are played

Against the roster

Stage Impact To Match WP

Each matchup, stage by stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Stage Impact To Round WP

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Where they are played

Against the roster

Stage Impact To Match WP

Each matchup, stage by stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Stage Impact To Round WP

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Where they are played