Virtua Fighter 5 REVO · v1.10 · Every character

Taka

Mid and high combined13,618 matchesMid ranks10,960 matchesHigh ranks2,658 matches

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate53.6%

Standing#1 of 19 · tier S

Pick rate1.8%

Most picked#18 of 19

Matches counted13,618

Unique players182

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Aoi	58.68%	284	200	484
Lion	57.87%	412	300	712
Brad	56.71%	431	329	760
Akira	55.72%	838	666	1,504
Goh	55.59%	398	318	716
Kage	55.39%	581	468	1,049
Dural	54.66%	88	73	161
Jacky	54.50%	727	607	1,334
Sarah	54.22%	347	293	640
Shun	54.07%	425	361	786
Pai	52.96%	304	270	574
El Blaze	52.80%	264	236	500
Vanessa	52.48%	307	278	585
Jeffry	51.19%	343	327	670
Wolf	50.91%	391	377	768
Lau	50.71%	463	450	913
Lei Fei	48.60%	278	294	572
Eileen	46.75%	115	131	246
Jean	46.58%	300	344	644

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Win Probability

Change from this character's own win rate, in points

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Aoi58.7%	71	44	59	50	63	55	50	63	62	63
Lion57.9%	53	58	53	47	58	71	71	53	61	53
Brad56.7%	50	57	56	62	74	56	67	57	46	49
Akira55.7%	50	55	59	60	55	62	58	52	55	51
Goh55.6%	60	57	55	59	54	65	55	55	51	49
Kage55.4%	52	35	50	60	57	67	50	55	61	56
Dural54.7%	45	59	33	55	61	50	64	60	50	67
Jacky54.5%	48	63	53	53	62	61	59	48	54	50
Sarah54.2%	47	59	58	57	64	55	46	52	56	49
Shun54.1%	42	59	46	50	50	53	63	58	55	55
Pai53.0%	67	57	58	35	56	49	68	38	49	57
El Blaze52.8%	51	49	59	74	64	47	70	49	48	42
Vanessa52.5%	56	56	48	58	45	58	26	57	51	48
Jeffry51.2%	53	49	51	53	60	44	48	56	48	54
Wolf50.9%	44	41	53	48	58	57	54	47	49	60
Lau50.7%	44	55	59	49	50	51	48	56	45	46
Lei Fei48.6%	41	41	54	57	56	57	53	44	42	53
Eileen46.8%	48	42	32	35	59	53	75	50	50	50
Jean46.6%	48	56	45	49	40	42	52	29	53	46

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls-2.7 pts behind walls (95% interval -4.8 to -0.6); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.118

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Aoi58.7%	58	60
Lion57.9%	54	61
Brad56.7%	54	59
Akira55.7%	55	56
Goh55.6%	56	57
Kage55.4%	53	60
Dural54.7%	51	60
Jacky54.5%	53	57
Sarah54.2%	55	55
Shun54.1%	52	53
Pai53.0%	51	55
El Blaze52.8%	55	49
Vanessa52.5%	54	51
Jeffry51.2%	52	53
Wolf50.9%	48	58
Lau50.7%	51	49
Lei Fei48.6%	46	55
Eileen46.8%	43	53
Jean46.6%	48	43

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round Win Probability

Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Aoi54.4%	61	47	53	49	57	51	52	59	56	56
Lion53.9%	52	53	51	50	54	60	60	51	55	52
Shun53.6%	48	57	51	50	53	51	56	55	56	55
Brad53.4%	49	54	54	53	64	53	59	53	49	49
Kage53.3%	51	42	49	56	55	61	50	52	55	55
Akira53.1%	51	52	55	54	54	57	55	50	52	52
Vanessa52.9%	57	55	50	57	50	56	39	55	53	50
Goh52.8%	55	53	53	55	52	61	51	51	51	50
Sarah52.0%	47	54	55	52	57	54	46	52	53	49
Jacky52.0%	51	54	50	51	55	57	56	48	51	50
Jeffry51.7%	53	49	52	53	57	50	50	52	50	53
Dural51.4%	49	53	43	49	55	45	53	50	52	62
Pai51.4%	57	53	55	44	53	50	60	44	49	53
El Blaze51.4%	53	51	54	60	54	49	56	51	48	45
Wolf50.6%	50	45	50	48	55	54	50	50	50	56
Lau50.5%	48	50	54	49	53	50	47	54	47	49
Eileen48.8%	52	46	42	40	50	53	62	51	50	52
Lei Fei48.2%	44	44	52	49	52	52	54	47	45	51
Jean47.4%	47	52	49	47	46	45	51	39	49	47

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls-2.0 pts behind walls (95% interval -3.0 to -1.0); holds up against the 20 characters tested, q=0.003

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Aoi54.4%	54	55
Lion53.9%	52	56
Shun53.6%	53	53
Brad53.4%	52	55
Kage53.3%	51	57
Akira53.1%	52	54
Vanessa52.9%	54	52
Goh52.8%	53	55
Sarah52.0%	52	53
Jacky52.0%	51	54
Jeffry51.7%	52	53
Dural51.4%	50	54
Pai51.4%	51	52
El Blaze51.4%	53	48
Wolf50.6%	49	55
Lau50.5%	50	51
Eileen48.8%	47	51
Lei Fei48.2%	47	52
Jean47.4%	48	46

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	1.64%	18	8,829
South America	1.87%	17	2,097
North America	2.22%	18	1,679
Europe	2.62%	16	457
Middle East	0.00%	18	0
Oceania	0.00%	17	0
Not recorded	2.13%	18	774

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate53.4%

Standing#1 of 19 · tier S

Pick rate1.7%

Most picked#18 of 19

Matches counted10,960

Unique players168

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Aoi	60.05%	251	167	418
Akira	56.40%	723	559	1,282
Dural	56.08%	83	65	148
Kage	55.86%	429	339	768
Lion	55.81%	269	213	482
Goh	55.66%	354	282	636
Jacky	54.83%	636	524	1,160
Brad	54.60%	350	291	641
Shun	53.44%	311	271	582
Pai	53.03%	254	225	479
Sarah	52.92%	290	258	548
Lau	51.81%	344	320	664
Wolf	50.89%	342	330	672
El Blaze	50.12%	205	204	409
Jeffry	50.08%	297	296	593
Eileen	48.72%	76	80	156
Jean	48.53%	264	280	544
Lei Fei	47.89%	193	210	403
Vanessa	47.20%	177	198	375

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Win Probability

Change from this character's own win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Aoi60.0%	68	47	57	53	62	56	53	65	61	71
Akira56.4%	51	57	58	59	57	63	62	53	55	52
Dural56.1%	47	59	33	60	65	50	56	60	50	75
Kage55.9%	52	42	50	59	55	73	46	51	64	56
Lion55.8%	49	57	49	45	55	72	69	50	60	56
Goh55.7%	54	59	53	60	53	68	60	55	51	50
Jacky54.8%	49	63	52	54	61	59	66	50	56	52
Brad54.6%	50	55	53	59	69	56	65	55	43	49
Shun53.4%	44	60	42	49	51	48	56	52	58	58
Pai53.0%	65	53	61	35	60	50	65	33	52	55
Sarah52.9%	42	60	54	57	66	55	43	51	58	40
Lau51.8%	46	53	62	49	59	54	42	52	49	44
Wolf50.9%	50	40	53	50	53	57	55	47	49	59
El Blaze50.1%	42	48	54	75	68	47	68	41	41	42
Jeffry50.1%	56	47	48	52	62	44	44	53	48	52
Eileen48.7%	57	35	21	38	55	55	100	48	64	53
Jean48.5%	50	56	44	56	41	44	52	29	54	52
Lei Fei47.9%	39	35	60	54	56	50	58	42	42	53
Vanessa47.2%	50	49	47	53	38	45	20	50	50	45

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls-3.2 pts behind walls (95% interval -5.5 to -0.9); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.058

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Aoi60.0%	59	63
Akira56.4%	55	57
Dural56.1%	52	64
Kage55.9%	53	62
Lion55.8%	51	62
Goh55.7%	55	57
Jacky54.8%	54	57
Brad54.6%	52	57
Shun53.4%	52	53
Pai53.0%	51	55
Sarah52.9%	54	52
Lau51.8%	52	53
Wolf50.9%	48	56
El Blaze50.1%	50	49
Jeffry50.1%	51	52
Eileen48.7%	45	54
Jean48.5%	49	46
Lei Fei47.9%	45	53
Vanessa47.2%	50	43

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round Win Probability

Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Aoi55.1%	60	48	52	50	57	53	54	59	56	60
Kage53.4%	52	46	49	55	52	64	49	50	56	55
Shun53.4%	50	57	50	50	54	48	54	52	57	56
Akira53.2%	51	54	54	53	55	57	57	50	51	52
Goh52.7%	53	53	52	56	52	63	52	51	50	50
Lion52.6%	49	53	50	49	50	60	58	50	54	53
Dural52.5%	51	53	43	53	56	45	51	50	52	67
Brad52.5%	50	53	53	53	61	53	58	52	47	49
Jacky52.2%	52	54	50	51	54	56	59	49	52	51
Pai51.5%	57	52	55	44	54	50	59	43	50	52
Jeffry51.3%	54	49	51	52	58	50	49	52	50	52
Sarah51.2%	45	55	54	53	57	54	44	51	53	43
Lau51.0%	49	50	55	50	57	51	43	54	49	48
Wolf50.6%	51	44	51	49	53	55	51	49	50	55
Vanessa49.8%	52	51	49	54	48	48	37	51	52	49
Eileen49.8%	54	44	37	39	50	55	75	49	56	54
El Blaze49.5%	48	49	52	59	56	48	56	46	45	45
Jean49.1%	49	53	48	53	48	46	51	40	50	52
Lei Fei48.8%	44	42	55	50	53	49	60	46	47	52

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls-2.2 pts behind walls (95% interval -3.4 to -1.0); holds up against the 20 characters tested, q=0.004

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Aoi55.1%	55	56
Kage53.4%	51	57
Shun53.4%	53	52
Akira53.2%	52	55
Goh52.7%	52	55
Lion52.6%	51	55
Dural52.5%	51	56
Brad52.5%	51	53
Jacky52.2%	51	54
Pai51.5%	51	52
Jeffry51.3%	51	53
Sarah51.2%	52	51
Lau51.0%	51	53
Wolf50.6%	49	54
Vanessa49.8%	51	48
Eileen49.8%	47	53
El Blaze49.5%	50	48
Jean49.1%	49	49
Lei Fei48.8%	47	52

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	1.46%	18	6,375
South America	1.88%	17	2,097
North America	2.24%	18	1,605
Europe	2.41%	13	353
Middle East	0.00%	18	0
Oceania	0.00%	17	0
Not recorded	2.18%	18	722

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate54.5%

Standing#1 of 19 · tier S

Pick rate2.4%

Most picked#18 of 19

Matches counted2,658

Unique players27

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Brad	68.07%	81	38	119
El Blaze	64.84%	59	32	91
Lion	62.17%	143	87	230
Sarah	61.96%	57	35	92
Vanessa	61.90%	130	80	210
Jeffry	59.74%	46	31	77
Shun	55.88%	114	90	204
Goh	55.00%	44	36	80
Kage	54.09%	152	129	281
Pai	52.63%	50	45	95
Jacky	52.30%	91	83	174
Akira	51.80%	115	107	222
Wolf	51.04%	49	47	96
Lei Fei	50.30%	85	84	169
Aoi	50.00%	33	33	66
Lau	47.79%	119	130	249
Eileen	43.33%	39	51	90
Dural	38.46%	5	8	13
Jean	36.00%	36	64	100

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Win Probability

Change from this character's own win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Brad68.1%	50	73	75	78	85	60	100	83	75	50
El Blaze64.8%	85	50	83	70	50	50	100	71	78	43
Lion62.2%	62	60	61	56	63	68	74	60	62	48
Sarah62.0%	73	57	80	56	57	60	67	67	45	80
Vanessa61.9%	71	68	48	71	55	72	50	70	53	59
Jeffry59.7%	29	62	83	67	54	40	67	67	50	71
Shun55.9%	38	57	60	52	47	65	75	82	44	48
Goh55.0%	90	45	62	43	62	50	20	60	100	44
Kage54.1%	50	15	52	62	60	53	67	68	52	57
Pai52.6%	83	75	46	36	38	43	100	57	38	70
Jacky52.3%	40	64	58	38	71	71	44	33	44	38
Akira51.8%	47	38	60	65	43	46	47	48	56	47
Wolf51.0%	17	50	53	38	89	54	50	56	50	80
Lei Fei50.3%	44	62	22	62	55	80	33	48	42	54
Aoi50.0%	100	29	67	20	67	43	0	50	67	41
Lau47.8%	37	60	47	50	30	37	83	62	35	49
Eileen43.3%	17	57	45	31	67	50	62	55	30	43
Dural38.5%	33	·	·	0	33	50	100	·	·	0
Jean36.0%	33	56	56	8	38	29	·	25	40	0

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls-0.6 pts behind walls (95% interval -5.1 to +4.0); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.887

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Brad68.1%	69	70
El Blaze64.8%	73	46
Lion62.2%	60	60
Sarah62.0%	63	69
Vanessa61.9%	63	64
Jeffry59.7%	61	56
Shun55.9%	54	54
Goh55.0%	62	52
Kage54.1%	52	57
Pai52.6%	51	52
Jacky52.3%	48	61
Akira51.8%	53	45
Wolf51.0%	43	70
Lei Fei50.3%	47	60
Aoi50.0%	53	48
Lau47.8%	50	39
Eileen43.3%	40	52
Dural38.5%	20	33
Jean36.0%	41	26

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round Win Probability

Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
El Blaze60.3%	73	59	62	65	48	55	60	65	66	46
Vanessa58.8%	68	63	51	65	54	64	54	64	54	55
Brad58.1%	47	56	70	56	69	52	67	70	62	53
Lion56.7%	58	53	53	53	61	62	63	55	58	49
Sarah56.7%	60	52	62	52	59	52	58	67	50	70
Jeffry55.1%	45	53	67	60	55	45	57	56	53	59
Shun54.1%	43	57	55	51	50	59	59	67	52	52
Goh53.7%	66	49	58	46	53	52	43	58	75	51
Kage52.8%	49	27	50	58	59	54	53	60	52	53
Akira52.5%	51	42	58	60	50	52	47	51	58	51
Pai50.7%	58	58	50	43	47	48	75	50	44	58
Jacky50.6%	43	56	53	44	58	60	49	46	45	43
Wolf50.4%	43	50	48	40	74	50	46	53	50	67
Aoi50.2%	71	40	56	37	61	42	0	54	59	47
Lau49.0%	46	52	51	46	43	43	71	54	42	51
Eileen47.2%	44	50	50	40	50	50	56	57	41	44
Lei Fei46.5%	44	51	32	47	48	65	33	50	42	50
Dural39.6%	36	·	·	0	46	44	60	·	·	25
Jean37.2%	33	49	51	15	40	37	·	31	41	4

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls-1.2 pts behind walls (95% interval -3.6 to +1.2); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.546

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
El Blaze60.3%	66	49
Vanessa58.8%	60	59
Brad58.1%	58	60
Lion56.7%	55	57
Sarah56.7%	56	62
Jeffry55.1%	55	54
Shun54.1%	53	54
Goh53.7%	56	52
Kage52.8%	51	56
Akira52.5%	54	51
Pai50.7%	49	52
Jacky50.6%	48	55
Wolf50.4%	47	60
Aoi50.2%	52	49
Lau49.0%	49	46
Eileen47.2%	47	48
Lei Fei46.5%	45	53
Dural39.6%	24	42
Jean37.2%	40	32

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	2.41%	18	2,454
North America	1.76%	13	74
Europe	3.77%	10	104
South America	0.00%	18	0
Not recorded	1.59%	12	52