Virtua Fighter 5 REVO · v1.10 · Every character

Lei Fei

Mid and high combined30,422 matchesMid ranks25,304 matchesHigh ranks5,118 matches

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate50.0%

Standing#9 of 19 · tier B

Pick rate4.0%

Most picked#15 of 19

Matches counted30,422

Unique players199

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Vanessa	53.14%	651	574	1,225
Goh	52.84%	885	790	1,675
Eileen	52.78%	247	221	468
Akira	52.66%	1,829	1,644	3,473
Jean	52.29%	858	783	1,641
Brad	51.85%	758	704	1,462
Taka	51.40%	294	278	572
Jacky	50.89%	1,494	1,442	2,936
Wolf	50.56%	898	878	1,776
Shun	50.00%	847	847	1,694
Lion	49.29%	874	899	1,773
Sarah	48.75%	836	879	1,715
Aoi	48.27%	641	687	1,328
El Blaze	48.25%	622	667	1,289
Kage	48.19%	959	1,031	1,990
Pai	48.04%	688	744	1,432
Lau	47.70%	934	1,024	1,958
Jeffry	44.86%	785	965	1,750
Dural	39.25%	104	161	265

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Win Probability

Change from this character's own win rate, in points

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Vanessa53.1%	49	57	56	54	50	48	46	52	54	59
Goh52.8%	49	57	53	52	55	56	48	54	48	49
Eileen52.8%	55	57	44	53	59	58	50	57	44	54
Akira52.7%	50	52	53	54	55	50	55	54	55	50
Jean52.3%	52	52	52	45	55	49	53	54	53	53
Brad51.9%	60	49	49	56	54	44	46	54	47	55
Taka51.4%	59	59	46	43	44	43	47	56	58	47
Jacky50.9%	48	52	48	47	51	48	55	53	53	55
Wolf50.6%	57	54	52	56	48	49	52	49	47	48
Shun50.0%	40	53	51	50	54	45	52	50	58	46
Lion49.3%	50	52	52	57	43	46	43	45	52	48
Sarah48.8%	45	44	47	45	49	55	54	50	53	46
Aoi48.3%	52	48	48	46	54	46	57	43	45	46
El Blaze48.2%	44	51	50	49	47	49	43	46	44	47
Kage48.2%	45	40	45	50	44	53	47	49	54	51
Pai48.0%	48	50	48	48	51	53	47	38	50	44
Lau47.7%	50	45	53	52	46	54	47	45	42	43
Jeffry44.9%	50	37	45	45	49	52	37	41	42	43
Dural39.2%	45	28	37	41	25	43	56	38	50	33

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls+0.2 pts behind walls (95% interval -1.2 to +1.6); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.843

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Vanessa53.1%	54	53
Goh52.8%	52	53
Eileen52.8%	52	57
Akira52.7%	53	51
Jean52.3%	51	52
Brad51.9%	53	51
Taka51.4%	54	45
Jacky50.9%	50	51
Wolf50.6%	52	48
Shun50.0%	51	48
Lion49.3%	52	46
Sarah48.8%	48	51
Aoi48.3%	47	49
El Blaze48.2%	48	48
Kage48.2%	47	50
Pai48.0%	47	50
Lau47.7%	48	48
Jeffry44.9%	43	48
Dural39.2%	41	35

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round Win Probability

Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Taka51.8%	56	56	48	51	48	48	46	53	55	49
Jean51.6%	51	53	49	48	53	51	52	52	52	52
Akira51.6%	50	53	52	53	53	49	52	52	53	50
Vanessa51.6%	48	53	54	51	51	48	49	53	53	54
Goh51.6%	51	55	51	49	53	53	48	52	49	51
Eileen51.3%	53	53	46	51	55	53	50	53	47	54
Shun51.2%	46	53	52	50	53	48	52	52	55	50
Brad51.1%	55	49	50	54	53	48	48	51	49	53
Jacky50.5%	49	52	49	49	50	49	52	51	52	52
Wolf50.2%	53	51	51	53	48	50	51	49	48	50
Lion50.0%	51	51	50	54	47	48	48	48	51	49
Sarah49.5%	49	48	49	47	50	53	52	49	52	48
Kage49.4%	48	45	48	51	48	51	51	48	53	51
El Blaze49.1%	46	52	49	50	47	49	49	48	47	49
Aoi49.1%	51	49	48	48	51	49	52	46	49	48
Lau48.7%	50	47	51	51	47	51	46	49	46	47
Pai48.6%	48	50	48	49	51	51	48	43	49	47
Jeffry47.2%	50	43	48	47	50	50	44	45	48	45
Dural43.3%	42	38	42	45	39	45	53	42	51	41

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls+0.2 pts behind walls (95% interval -0.5 to +0.8); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.660

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Taka51.8%	53	48
Jean51.6%	51	52
Akira51.6%	52	50
Vanessa51.6%	52	51
Goh51.6%	51	52
Eileen51.3%	51	54
Shun51.2%	52	50
Brad51.1%	51	51
Jacky50.5%	50	50
Wolf50.2%	51	50
Lion50.0%	51	48
Sarah49.5%	49	50
Kage49.4%	49	50
El Blaze49.1%	49	48
Aoi49.1%	48	50
Lau48.7%	49	49
Pai48.6%	48	50
Jeffry47.2%	47	48
Dural43.3%	44	42

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	4.40%	14	23,746
South America	3.07%	16	3,450
North America	3.88%	14	2,941
Europe	3.90%	9	679
Middle East	0.00%	14	0
Oceania	36.77%	2	82
Not recorded	1.10%	19	402

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate49.2%

Standing#15 of 19 · tier C

Pick rate3.9%

Most picked#15 of 19

Matches counted25,304

Unique players185

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Akira	52.81%	1,559	1,393	2,952
Taka	52.11%	210	193	403
Goh	51.94%	805	745	1,550
Jacky	51.30%	1,287	1,222	2,509
Brad	51.21%	594	566	1,160
Jean	51.20%	767	731	1,498
Wolf	50.58%	828	809	1,637
Shun	49.20%	677	699	1,376
Vanessa	48.95%	444	463	907
Eileen	48.81%	144	151	295
Lion	47.68%	638	700	1,338
Aoi	47.48%	555	614	1,169
Lau	47.27%	702	783	1,485
El Blaze	47.21%	465	520	985
Sarah	46.98%	693	782	1,475
Kage	46.93%	735	831	1,566
Pai	46.48%	542	624	1,166
Jeffry	44.25%	697	878	1,575
Dural	38.76%	100	158	258

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Win Probability

Change from this character's own win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Akira52.8%	48	51	54	55	56	50	60	53	55	50
Taka52.1%	61	65	40	46	44	50	42	58	58	47
Goh51.9%	48	55	52	52	53	56	46	53	49	48
Jacky51.3%	49	52	49	48	51	48	55	53	53	56
Brad51.2%	58	50	42	56	53	42	45	56	49	59
Jean51.2%	52	50	51	43	53	49	51	51	53	52
Wolf50.6%	58	56	52	54	46	48	53	49	45	50
Shun49.2%	36	51	53	49	55	44	48	49	56	48
Vanessa49.0%	47	53	50	52	46	43	43	47	49	56
Eileen48.8%	44	53	41	52	65	62	38	43	52	47
Lion47.7%	48	51	49	55	38	44	45	48	48	47
Aoi47.5%	50	48	48	46	52	44	61	42	45	44
Lau47.3%	47	42	54	53	46	54	43	48	40	44
El Blaze47.2%	42	50	50	45	47	46	49	42	44	48
Sarah47.0%	45	43	44	46	50	53	51	47	51	41
Kage46.9%	43	39	45	51	43	48	48	46	52	51
Pai46.5%	44	47	44	46	48	52	46	36	50	49
Jeffry44.2%	49	36	45	42	50	49	36	42	43	41
Dural38.8%	45	28	35	41	27	40	56	36	50	33

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls-0.1 pts behind walls (95% interval -1.7 to +1.4); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.896

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Akira52.8%	53	52
Taka52.1%	55	47
Goh51.9%	52	52
Jacky51.3%	51	52
Brad51.2%	52	51
Jean51.2%	50	51
Wolf50.6%	53	48
Shun49.2%	49	48
Vanessa49.0%	50	49
Eileen48.8%	47	56
Lion47.7%	50	43
Aoi47.5%	46	47
Lau47.3%	47	48
El Blaze47.2%	45	47
Sarah47.0%	46	49
Kage46.9%	46	47
Pai46.5%	44	50
Jeffry44.2%	43	47
Dural38.8%	40	34

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round Win Probability

Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Akira51.8%	50	52	52	53	54	50	54	52	53	49
Taka51.2%	56	58	45	50	47	51	40	54	53	48
Goh51.1%	51	55	50	50	52	53	48	51	49	50
Shun51.0%	45	51	53	51	54	48	51	52	54	51
Jean50.9%	51	52	49	47	51	51	51	51	52	51
Jacky50.7%	49	52	49	50	50	49	51	52	52	53
Brad50.6%	54	49	47	54	53	46	48	52	49	54
Wolf50.2%	54	52	51	52	48	49	52	50	47	51
Vanessa49.5%	47	51	51	50	48	45	48	49	51	52
Lion49.1%	50	50	49	54	45	47	49	49	49	49
Eileen49.1%	49	50	43	50	55	54	42	47	53	50
Kage48.8%	46	44	48	52	48	49	51	47	52	51
Aoi48.8%	51	50	47	48	50	48	55	45	48	48
El Blaze48.6%	45	51	50	48	47	48	51	47	47	48
Sarah48.4%	49	47	47	47	49	52	50	48	51	44
Lau48.4%	48	46	51	51	48	51	44	50	44	48
Pai47.7%	46	48	45	48	49	51	47	42	50	49
Jeffry47.0%	49	42	48	46	51	48	44	46	48	44
Dural43.1%	42	38	41	45	39	44	53	41	51	41

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls+0.0 pts behind walls (95% interval -0.7 to +0.8); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.986

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Akira51.8%	52	51
Taka51.2%	53	48
Goh51.1%	51	52
Shun51.0%	51	51
Jean50.9%	51	51
Jacky50.7%	51	50
Brad50.6%	51	51
Wolf50.2%	51	49
Vanessa49.5%	50	49
Lion49.1%	50	47
Eileen49.1%	49	53
Kage48.8%	48	49
Aoi48.8%	48	49
El Blaze48.6%	48	48
Sarah48.4%	48	49
Lau48.4%	49	49
Pai47.7%	47	50
Jeffry47.0%	46	48
Dural43.1%	43	42

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	4.31%	14	18,860
South America	3.06%	16	3,413
North America	3.67%	14	2,624
Europe	4.25%	9	624
Middle East	0.00%	14	0
Oceania	36.77%	2	82
Not recorded	1.08%	19	359

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate54.0%

Standing#2 of 19 · tier S

Pick rate4.7%

Most picked#10 of 19

Matches counted5,118

Unique players29

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Vanessa	65.09%	207	111	318
Goh	64.00%	80	45	125
Jean	63.64%	91	52	143
Sarah	59.58%	143	97	240
Eileen	59.54%	103	70	173
Dural	57.14%	4	3	7
Pai	54.89%	146	120	266
Brad	54.30%	164	138	302
Lion	54.25%	236	199	435
Aoi	54.09%	86	73	159
Shun	53.46%	170	148	318
Kage	52.83%	224	200	424
Akira	51.82%	270	251	521
El Blaze	51.64%	157	147	304
Wolf	50.36%	70	69	139
Jeffry	50.29%	88	87	175
Taka	49.70%	84	85	169
Lau	49.05%	232	241	473
Jacky	48.48%	207	220	427

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Win Probability

Change from this character's own win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Vanessa65.1%	55	64	78	65	61	57	56	71	68	68
Goh64.0%	67	76	73	46	77	67	67	61	36	61
Jean63.6%	43	70	58	60	70	54	67	83	53	70
Sarah59.6%	47	56	61	40	43	68	65	65	71	69
Eileen59.5%	81	67	50	56	53	53	62	79	31	61
Dural57.1%	·	·	100	·	0	67	·	100	·	·
Pai54.9%	61	58	68	59	67	56	55	50	50	25
Brad54.3%	73	45	77	58	57	59	50	46	40	41
Lion54.2%	62	59	63	62	55	50	38	33	61	53
Aoi54.1%	67	44	52	43	65	59	38	53	50	62
Shun53.5%	52	61	44	52	50	53	80	51	76	39
Kage52.8%	58	44	44	49	49	67	46	58	61	52
Akira51.8%	58	55	47	47	51	47	36	61	55	50
El Blaze51.6%	50	56	50	62	50	54	0	56	44	44
Wolf50.4%	46	25	55	64	78	78	0	43	56	35
Jeffry50.3%	53	67	48	62	40	75	50	40	38	57
Taka49.7%	56	38	78	38	45	20	67	52	58	46
Lau49.0%	59	54	50	50	45	54	61	37	47	40
Jacky48.5%	39	49	46	44	50	48	52	49	55	49

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls+1.9 pts behind walls (95% interval -1.4 to +5.2); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.625

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Vanessa65.1%	66	62
Goh64.0%	61	68
Jean63.6%	62	65
Sarah59.6%	57	61
Eileen59.5%	63	57
Dural57.1%	100	50
Pai54.9%	58	49
Brad54.3%	55	51
Lion54.2%	57	52
Aoi54.1%	52	62
Shun53.5%	55	44
Kage52.8%	52	56
Akira51.8%	54	49
El Blaze51.6%	54	50
Wolf50.4%	51	57
Jeffry50.3%	51	55
Taka49.7%	53	40
Lau49.0%	49	46
Jacky48.5%	47	49

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round Win Probability

Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Jean58.7%	48	62	54	57	64	55	63	62	56	62
Vanessa57.5%	52	57	65	56	56	53	50	65	57	59
Goh57.5%	61	59	66	46	62	67	56	53	49	61
Sarah56.6%	50	54	57	47	50	60	61	54	68	62
Eileen55.1%	65	58	51	56	54	51	59	63	35	57
Taka53.5%	56	49	68	53	52	35	67	50	58	50
Brad52.9%	60	49	64	54	56	58	47	48	48	47
Lion52.6%	56	55	55	58	52	51	47	45	56	50
Pai52.5%	54	53	61	54	59	53	57	49	48	41
Shun52.4%	52	60	48	48	50	49	60	52	67	45
Dural51.9%	·	·	75	·	40	55	·	75	·	·
Kage51.6%	56	49	47	49	48	57	51	51	56	52
El Blaze50.9%	48	56	47	57	47	52	33	51	49	50
Aoi50.9%	51	47	50	48	57	60	40	48	52	50
Akira50.5%	51	55	50	48	49	47	42	53	54	52
Wolf50.3%	47	39	57	57	59	60	25	43	53	42
Lau49.7%	56	52	50	51	47	52	54	45	48	45
Jeffry49.3%	52	58	48	57	41	62	48	43	48	52
Jacky49.0%	46	49	46	46	51	50	53	46	51	49

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls+0.9 pts behind walls (95% interval -0.8 to +2.6); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.546

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Jean58.7%	57	61
Vanessa57.5%	58	55
Goh57.5%	56	62
Sarah56.6%	55	58
Eileen55.1%	56	55
Taka53.5%	55	47
Brad52.9%	53	53
Lion52.6%	54	51
Pai52.5%	53	51
Shun52.4%	54	47
Dural51.9%	75	50
Kage51.6%	51	53
El Blaze50.9%	52	50
Aoi50.9%	49	56
Akira50.5%	52	49
Wolf50.3%	51	52
Lau49.7%	50	48
Jeffry49.3%	51	50
Jacky49.0%	47	50

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	4.79%	9	4,886
North America	7.56%	5	317
Europe	2.00%	16	55
South America	6.54%	5	37
Not recorded	1.32%	13	43