Virtua Fighter 5 REVO · v1.10 · Every character

Lau

Mid and high combined47,083 matchesMid ranks36,689 matchesHigh ranks10,394 matches

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate51.5%

Standing#4 of 19 · tier A

Pick rate6.4%

Most picked#4 of 19

Matches counted47,083

Unique players333

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Vanessa	54.31%	1,009	849	1,858
Jean	54.28%	1,364	1,149	2,513
Jeffry	52.33%	1,416	1,290	2,706
Lei Fei	52.30%	1,024	934	1,958
Wolf	52.26%	1,400	1,279	2,679
Aoi	51.98%	1,091	1,008	2,099
Goh	51.97%	1,386	1,281	2,667
Akira	51.82%	2,483	2,309	4,792
Shun	51.66%	1,451	1,358	2,809
Pai	51.61%	1,283	1,203	2,486
Brad	51.54%	1,372	1,290	2,662
Lion	51.34%	1,549	1,468	3,017
Jacky	50.95%	2,387	2,298	4,685
Sarah	50.67%	1,172	1,141	2,313
Kage	49.65%	1,706	1,730	3,436
El Blaze	49.61%	1,095	1,112	2,207
Taka	49.29%	450	463	913
Eileen	48.46%	455	484	939
Dural	47.09%	162	182	344

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Win Probability

Change from this character's own win rate, in points

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Vanessa54.3%	55	58	50	57	56	54	51	56	46	55
Jean54.3%	46	59	53	58	49	55	56	56	58	55
Jeffry52.3%	51	54	54	53	52	55	50	51	50	52
Lei Fei52.3%	50	55	47	48	54	46	53	55	58	57
Wolf52.3%	54	55	48	54	42	53	52	57	54	54
Aoi52.0%	54	65	54	45	47	50	59	48	53	48
Goh52.0%	51	57	52	48	53	46	55	54	56	49
Akira51.8%	52	53	51	52	49	53	59	49	52	54
Shun51.7%	57	53	48	53	48	55	56	49	51	51
Pai51.6%	55	50	51	49	53	52	46	52	51	53
Brad51.5%	51	52	55	48	51	52	52	55	51	50
Lion51.3%	54	47	52	55	51	52	58	53	51	45
Jacky51.0%	54	51	53	48	46	54	45	51	53	53
Sarah50.7%	48	54	50	45	56	49	55	49	53	49
Kage49.6%	49	54	52	51	50	48	44	51	49	50
El Blaze49.6%	50	52	55	53	50	48	47	45	46	50
Taka49.3%	56	45	41	51	50	49	52	44	55	54
Eileen48.5%	49	38	56	38	49	54	50	56	53	46
Dural47.1%	49	56	50	46	38	52	56	52	32	46

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls+0.8 pts behind walls (95% interval -0.3 to +1.9); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.318

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Vanessa54.3%	54	55
Jean54.3%	55	53
Jeffry52.3%	52	53
Lei Fei52.3%	52	52
Wolf52.3%	54	49
Aoi52.0%	53	49
Goh52.0%	53	49
Akira51.8%	51	52
Shun51.7%	52	51
Pai51.6%	51	53
Brad51.5%	52	51
Lion51.3%	52	50
Jacky51.0%	51	51
Sarah50.7%	50	51
Kage49.6%	51	49
El Blaze49.6%	50	49
Taka49.3%	49	51
Eileen48.5%	48	49
Dural47.1%	47	44

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round Win Probability

Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Jean52.5%	49	54	52	54	50	53	54	53	54	54
Vanessa52.4%	53	54	51	53	53	53	52	53	49	52
Shun51.7%	54	53	50	52	50	53	56	50	52	50
Wolf51.5%	53	52	50	53	47	51	51	54	52	52
Lei Fei51.3%	50	53	49	49	53	49	54	51	54	53
Jeffry51.1%	51	51	51	51	50	53	51	51	51	51
Akira51.1%	51	51	51	52	49	52	55	50	51	52
Goh51.1%	51	53	51	50	51	49	52	52	53	50
Pai51.0%	52	51	51	50	53	50	49	51	52	51
Brad51.0%	50	52	53	50	51	51	49	53	50	49
Lion50.9%	52	49	51	51	50	51	55	51	52	48
Aoi50.9%	52	56	53	47	49	51	53	49	51	49
Jacky50.6%	52	51	52	49	48	52	48	50	51	52
Sarah50.0%	48	50	50	47	52	50	52	48	51	49
Dural49.9%	49	56	48	52	47	52	55	52	44	49
Kage49.7%	49	51	51	49	50	49	47	51	49	51
El Blaze49.7%	50	50	53	51	50	48	48	48	48	50
Taka49.5%	52	50	46	51	47	50	53	46	53	51
Eileen48.6%	48	44	52	42	49	51	50	51	52	47

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls+0.4 pts behind walls (95% interval -0.1 to +1.0); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.407

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Jean52.5%	53	52
Vanessa52.4%	52	53
Shun51.7%	52	51
Wolf51.5%	52	50
Lei Fei51.3%	51	51
Jeffry51.1%	51	51
Akira51.1%	51	51
Goh51.1%	52	50
Pai51.0%	51	51
Brad51.0%	51	51
Lion50.9%	51	50
Aoi50.9%	51	49
Jacky50.6%	51	50
Sarah50.0%	49	50
Dural49.9%	50	49
Kage49.7%	50	50
El Blaze49.7%	50	49
Taka49.5%	50	49
Eileen48.6%	48	49

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	7.43%	3	40,080
South America	4.89%	10	5,493
North America	3.70%	15	2,802
Europe	2.84%	14	495
Middle East	0.00%	13	0
Oceania	4.93%	5	11
Not recorded	3.21%	12	1,170

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate50.8%

Standing#7 of 19 · tier A

Pick rate5.8%

Most picked#6 of 19

Matches counted36,689

Unique players308

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Vanessa	53.10%	710	627	1,337
Jean	52.84%	1,181	1,054	2,235
Lei Fei	52.73%	783	702	1,485
Wolf	52.37%	1,216	1,106	2,322
Akira	51.37%	1,964	1,859	3,823
Goh	51.15%	1,133	1,082	2,215
Jacky	50.91%	1,843	1,777	3,620
Shun	50.77%	1,086	1,053	2,139
Jeffry	50.57%	1,197	1,170	2,367
Sarah	50.52%	973	953	1,926
Pai	50.50%	918	900	1,818
Brad	50.31%	1,067	1,054	2,121
Aoi	50.18%	844	838	1,682
Lion	49.65%	997	1,011	2,008
El Blaze	49.37%	703	721	1,424
Kage	49.03%	1,286	1,337	2,623
Dural	48.66%	145	153	298
Eileen	48.28%	281	301	582
Taka	48.19%	320	344	664

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Win Probability

Change from this character's own win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Vanessa53.1%	55	55	46	61	52	52	51	55	44	54
Jean52.8%	45	57	50	55	48	55	54	55	58	52
Lei Fei52.7%	53	58	46	47	54	46	57	52	60	56
Wolf52.4%	55	53	47	55	42	54	54	56	54	53
Akira51.4%	50	54	51	53	49	52	58	47	51	55
Goh51.1%	50	57	51	46	53	46	56	52	55	51
Jacky50.9%	52	49	52	48	45	59	44	50	51	55
Shun50.8%	56	52	48	52	47	51	51	48	52	52
Jeffry50.6%	50	51	53	50	51	52	48	48	50	51
Sarah50.5%	47	52	51	43	57	49	57	50	51	49
Pai50.5%	52	46	54	46	55	52	42	50	52	52
Brad50.3%	50	50	54	47	53	52	50	51	52	45
Aoi50.2%	51	65	54	42	44	48	54	48	52	48
Lion49.6%	53	44	46	55	53	46	59	48	51	47
El Blaze49.4%	51	55	53	53	51	40	47	43	47	51
Kage49.0%	46	53	51	49	49	47	45	50	51	51
Dural48.7%	52	55	53	47	39	53	53	55	38	44
Eileen48.3%	50	45	47	39	46	53	48	51	59	45
Taka48.2%	54	47	38	51	41	46	58	48	51	56

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls+0.3 pts behind walls (95% interval -0.9 to +1.6); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.799

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Vanessa53.1%	53	53
Jean52.8%	53	52
Lei Fei52.7%	53	52
Wolf52.4%	53	50
Akira51.4%	51	52
Goh51.1%	52	50
Jacky50.9%	50	53
Shun50.8%	51	50
Jeffry50.6%	50	51
Sarah50.5%	49	52
Pai50.5%	50	53
Brad50.3%	50	51
Aoi50.2%	52	46
Lion49.6%	49	49
El Blaze49.4%	50	48
Kage49.0%	50	49
Dural48.7%	50	44
Eileen48.3%	49	48
Taka48.2%	48	47

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round Win Probability

Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Jean51.8%	48	52	52	52	50	53	53	53	54	52
Wolf51.7%	53	52	50	55	47	51	52	54	52	52
Vanessa51.7%	53	53	48	53	51	52	51	53	47	52
Lei Fei51.6%	52	54	49	49	52	49	56	50	56	52
Shun51.2%	53	52	50	52	50	51	53	49	52	51
Dural51.0%	51	55	49	53	48	51	53	54	48	49
Akira50.8%	50	52	51	52	48	51	55	49	51	53
Goh50.7%	51	53	51	49	51	49	52	51	52	50
Jacky50.6%	51	50	52	49	48	54	47	50	50	53
Brad50.4%	49	51	53	49	53	51	49	51	50	47
Pai50.3%	50	48	53	48	53	49	45	50	52	51
Jeffry50.2%	51	50	51	49	50	52	50	50	51	50
Aoi50.0%	51	56	53	46	47	49	51	49	51	49
Lion49.9%	52	48	49	50	51	48	55	49	51	49
Sarah49.9%	48	49	50	46	52	50	53	48	51	49
El Blaze49.8%	51	52	52	51	51	46	49	48	48	50
Kage49.3%	48	51	50	48	50	49	47	51	50	51
Taka49.0%	51	50	45	50	43	49	57	46	51	52
Eileen48.6%	49	48	49	42	48	50	48	49	56	46

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls+0.2 pts behind walls (95% interval -0.4 to +0.8); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.713

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Jean51.8%	52	52
Wolf51.7%	52	50
Vanessa51.7%	51	52
Lei Fei51.6%	51	51
Shun51.2%	51	51
Dural51.0%	52	49
Akira50.8%	51	51
Goh50.7%	51	50
Jacky50.6%	50	52
Brad50.4%	50	51
Pai50.3%	50	51
Jeffry50.2%	50	51
Aoi50.0%	51	48
Lion49.9%	50	50
Sarah49.9%	49	50
El Blaze49.8%	50	49
Kage49.3%	50	50
Taka49.0%	49	47
Eileen48.6%	49	48

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	6.72%	4	29,381
South America	4.92%	10	5,492
North America	3.55%	15	2,537
Europe	2.01%	15	295
Middle East	0.00%	13	0
Oceania	4.93%	5	11
Not recorded	3.41%	10	1,129

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate54.0%

Standing#3 of 19 · tier A

Pick rate9.9%

Most picked#1 of 19

Matches counted10,394

Unique players59

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Jean	65.83%	183	95	278
Jeffry	64.60%	219	120	339
Aoi	59.23%	247	170	417
Vanessa	57.39%	299	222	521
Brad	56.38%	305	236	541
Goh	55.97%	253	199	452
Lion	54.71%	552	457	1,009
Pai	54.64%	365	303	668
Shun	54.48%	365	305	670
Akira	53.56%	519	450	969
Taka	52.21%	130	119	249
Kage	51.66%	420	393	813
Wolf	51.54%	184	173	357
Sarah	51.42%	199	188	387
Jacky	51.08%	544	521	1,065
Lei Fei	50.95%	241	232	473
El Blaze	50.06%	392	391	783
Eileen	48.74%	174	183	357
Dural	36.96%	17	29	46

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Win Probability

Change from this character's own win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Jean65.8%	64	72	67	71	53	56	64	71	62	70
Jeffry64.6%	52	73	58	78	61	69	62	69	55	62
Aoi59.2%	70	65	56	54	61	61	82	54	57	51
Vanessa57.4%	53	65	63	50	67	63	53	61	49	57
Brad56.4%	57	59	59	59	42	51	60	69	45	65
Goh56.0%	57	60	60	60	56	42	52	64	60	44
Lion54.7%	55	54	63	55	48	63	58	62	50	42
Pai54.6%	64	65	38	56	49	54	51	56	49	57
Shun54.5%	58	61	49	57	51	66	64	54	49	47
Akira53.6%	58	48	50	48	50	59	65	58	56	53
Taka52.2%	63	40	53	50	70	63	17	38	65	51
Kage51.7%	56	58	53	60	50	51	43	52	44	50
Wolf51.5%	48	77	51	43	38	44	36	60	54	62
Sarah51.4%	51	68	45	53	53	46	47	45	58	50
Jacky51.1%	59	55	54	48	47	38	48	52	62	45
Lei Fei51.0%	41	46	50	50	55	46	39	63	53	60
El Blaze50.1%	48	44	58	55	47	61	46	49	44	48
Eileen48.7%	47	33	75	35	56	56	53	62	42	48
Dural37.0%	33	60	33	0	25	50	100	0	17	67

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls+2.3 pts behind walls (95% interval -0.1 to +4.6); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.399

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Jean65.8%	68	60
Jeffry64.6%	64	64
Aoi59.2%	60	57
Vanessa57.4%	56	63
Brad56.4%	59	52
Goh56.0%	60	47
Lion54.7%	57	51
Pai54.6%	55	53
Shun54.5%	54	54
Akira53.6%	53	54
Taka52.2%	50	61
Kage51.7%	54	50
Wolf51.5%	54	48
Sarah51.4%	53	50
Jacky51.1%	55	43
Lei Fei51.0%	51	54
El Blaze50.1%	49	52
Eileen48.7%	47	53
Dural37.0%	29	44

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round Win Probability

Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Jean58.7%	59	65	56	62	51	54	62	60	56	63
Jeffry57.0%	55	57	57	65	54	58	54	59	52	56
Aoi54.2%	56	57	54	52	55	56	66	51	52	50
Vanessa54.2%	52	57	59	52	59	56	53	54	51	53
Brad53.5%	55	55	56	57	44	51	53	61	47	57
Shun53.4%	58	57	51	54	52	61	61	51	49	48
Pai53.0%	58	59	47	54	51	52	55	52	51	52
Lion52.9%	53	53	55	53	49	57	56	56	53	47
Goh52.7%	52	55	51	57	52	46	52	55	57	48
Akira52.2%	54	49	50	52	50	54	58	55	52	52
Kage51.0%	53	53	52	53	51	50	45	53	48	51
Taka51.0%	54	48	49	54	57	57	29	46	58	49
Jacky50.5%	53	52	52	49	47	45	50	52	56	48
Lei Fei50.3%	44	48	50	49	53	48	46	55	52	55
Sarah50.2%	47	58	48	50	51	48	46	48	53	51
Wolf49.9%	51	60	50	41	43	48	44	54	51	57
El Blaze49.5%	49	45	54	50	48	53	48	50	48	50
Eileen48.6%	47	40	58	43	53	51	54	54	46	50
Dural42.8%	38	62	43	40	33	62	100	0	35	50

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls+1.2 pts behind walls (95% interval -0.1 to +2.4); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.383

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Jean58.7%	60	56
Jeffry57.0%	57	56
Aoi54.2%	54	53
Vanessa54.2%	54	57
Brad53.5%	55	51
Shun53.4%	53	53
Pai53.0%	53	52
Lion52.9%	54	51
Goh52.7%	54	49
Akira52.2%	52	52
Kage51.0%	52	51
Taka51.0%	51	54
Jacky50.5%	52	47
Lei Fei50.3%	50	52
Sarah50.2%	51	51
Wolf49.9%	51	50
El Blaze49.5%	49	50
Eileen48.6%	47	51
Dural42.8%	40	46

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	10.49%	1	10,699
North America	6.32%	6	265
Europe	7.26%	5	200
South America	0.18%	9	1
Not recorded	1.26%	15	41