Virtua Fighter 5 REVO · v1.10 · Every character

Eileen

Mid and high combined12,737 matchesMid ranks9,217 matchesHigh ranks3,520 matches

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate52.6%

Standing#2 of 19 · tier S

Pick rate1.7%

Most picked#19 of 19

Matches counted12,737

Unique players168

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Vanessa	58.37%	286	204	490
Wolf	57.59%	387	285	672
Pai	55.37%	304	245	549
Sarah	55.03%	399	326	725
Jean	54.98%	309	253	562
Shun	54.78%	361	298	659
Goh	54.02%	410	349	759
Jeffry	53.28%	341	299	640
Taka	53.25%	131	115	246
Aoi	52.88%	303	270	573
Lion	52.46%	384	348	732
Jacky	52.22%	670	613	1,283
Lau	51.54%	484	455	939
Brad	50.93%	329	317	646
Kage	50.06%	421	420	841
Akira	49.57%	633	644	1,277
El Blaze	48.59%	259	274	533
Dural	47.55%	68	75	143
Lei Fei	47.22%	221	247	468

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Win Probability

Change from this character's own win rate, in points

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Vanessa58.4%	67	64	46	52	57	61	62	59	57	56
Wolf57.6%	56	50	58	53	68	58	66	56	56	55
Pai55.4%	57	49	65	46	62	45	46	52	53	63
Sarah55.0%	57	54	60	55	58	58	57	58	50	51
Jean55.0%	46	52	53	42	62	57	49	49	72	75
Shun54.8%	58	65	46	55	50	49	50	46	54	69
Goh54.0%	53	47	51	55	54	57	60	52	57	54
Jeffry53.3%	49	55	45	54	60	64	54	47	53	51
Taka53.2%	52	58	68	65	41	47	25	50	50	50
Aoi52.9%	53	63	58	60	60	65	41	44	49	40
Lion52.5%	46	53	55	57	53	50	20	47	58	64
Jacky52.2%	54	59	45	53	46	48	65	51	54	50
Lau51.5%	51	62	44	62	51	46	50	44	47	54
Brad50.9%	49	48	39	53	52	53	52	59	54	50
Kage50.1%	56	57	44	51	55	49	36	42	52	48
Akira49.6%	49	53	52	48	49	53	43	49	47	47
El Blaze48.6%	56	58	45	38	45	47	59	53	39	61
Dural47.5%	38	73	33	36	48	40	57	38	43	57
Lei Fei47.2%	45	43	56	47	41	42	50	43	56	46

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls-1.5 pts behind walls (95% interval -3.7 to +0.7); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.318

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Vanessa58.4%	58	58
Wolf57.6%	55	61
Pai55.4%	53	57
Sarah55.0%	55	56
Jean55.0%	51	65
Shun54.8%	54	58
Goh54.0%	53	55
Jeffry53.3%	51	59
Taka53.2%	57	47
Aoi52.9%	54	54
Lion52.5%	52	55
Jacky52.2%	52	48
Lau51.5%	52	51
Brad50.9%	50	52
Kage50.1%	50	50
Akira49.6%	50	49
El Blaze48.6%	48	50
Dural47.5%	44	50
Lei Fei47.2%	48	43

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round Win Probability

Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Vanessa54.1%	59	56	48	52	51	56	58	52	53	55
Jean54.0%	50	53	54	48	57	53	51	49	64	66
Wolf53.9%	54	49	55	53	58	54	57	53	52	53
Pai53.4%	53	50	60	49	55	48	49	49	55	58
Sarah53.4%	53	54	55	53	54	54	55	57	51	53
Shun53.4%	53	57	49	53	53	51	53	48	54	60
Lion51.7%	50	51	52	53	53	51	38	49	54	59
Goh51.7%	52	47	51	53	52	52	56	50	55	49
Aoi51.5%	52	57	56	54	55	56	45	48	46	46
Lau51.4%	52	56	48	58	51	49	50	49	48	53
Brad51.3%	50	51	46	52	51	52	52	56	53	49
Jeffry51.2%	50	52	49	52	55	54	55	48	51	49
Taka51.2%	48	54	58	60	50	47	38	49	50	48
Jacky50.8%	51	53	47	51	50	51	54	51	52	49
Kage50.4%	53	54	48	51	50	50	44	46	51	49
Akira50.0%	50	52	51	49	51	54	46	49	48	48
Dural49.7%	48	68	44	44	48	35	56	43	46	52
Lei Fei48.7%	47	47	54	49	45	47	50	47	53	46
El Blaze48.6%	49	54	47	43	48	50	54	51	45	52

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls-0.7 pts behind walls (95% interval -1.8 to +0.4); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.407

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Vanessa54.1%	54	54
Jean54.0%	52	59
Wolf53.9%	53	55
Pai53.4%	52	54
Sarah53.4%	54	54
Shun53.4%	53	56
Lion51.7%	51	54
Goh51.7%	52	51
Aoi51.5%	52	52
Lau51.4%	52	51
Brad51.3%	52	51
Jeffry51.2%	50	53
Taka51.2%	53	49
Jacky50.8%	51	50
Kage50.4%	50	50
Akira50.0%	50	51
Dural49.7%	49	48
Lei Fei48.7%	49	46
El Blaze48.6%	48	50

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	1.59%	19	8,583
South America	1.43%	19	1,602
North America	0.99%	19	748
Europe	2.20%	17	384
Middle East	0.00%	10	0
Oceania	36.77%	1	82
Not recorded	4.49%	9	1,634

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate53.1%

Standing#2 of 19 · tier S

Pick rate1.4%

Most picked#19 of 19

Matches counted9,217

Unique players151

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Wolf	59.11%	331	229	560
Shun	57.08%	254	191	445
Vanessa	56.93%	189	143	332
Goh	56.31%	357	277	634
Jacky	54.34%	507	426	933
Lion	54.13%	223	189	412
Aoi	53.83%	260	223	483
Pai	53.28%	203	178	381
Brad	52.32%	237	216	453
El Blaze	52.24%	198	181	379
Sarah	52.08%	276	254	530
Lau	51.72%	301	281	582
Jeffry	51.66%	280	262	542
Taka	51.28%	80	76	156
Lei Fei	51.19%	151	144	295
Jean	50.98%	233	224	457
Akira	50.95%	485	467	952
Kage	48.23%	273	293	566
Dural	48.00%	60	65	125

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Win Probability

Change from this character's own win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Wolf59.1%	59	50	58	57	66	58	69	58	57	60
Shun57.1%	58	60	46	59	60	52	60	46	58	69
Vanessa56.9%	58	61	48	47	57	67	59	50	63	55
Goh56.3%	55	50	49	57	57	57	61	56	61	59
Jacky54.3%	54	62	50	49	51	55	62	55	56	52
Lion54.1%	42	55	65	61	52	58	9	41	59	66
Aoi53.8%	51	63	61	60	64	64	42	43	53	38
Pai53.3%	61	39	63	47	58	51	43	49	44	66
Brad52.3%	43	47	44	51	58	48	50	67	60	51
El Blaze52.2%	57	64	44	40	49	50	67	54	44	62
Sarah52.1%	50	52	57	54	55	58	55	51	48	44
Lau51.7%	50	55	53	61	54	47	52	49	41	55
Jeffry51.7%	47	53	40	54	58	61	50	48	52	47
Taka51.3%	43	65	79	62	45	45	0	52	36	47
Lei Fei51.2%	56	47	59	48	35	38	62	57	48	53
Jean51.0%	45	46	46	39	59	50	46	48	73	75
Akira51.0%	53	51	50	48	48	57	46	49	50	50
Kage48.2%	53	57	43	45	57	46	31	43	50	51
Dural48.0%	33	73	33	44	52	40	54	38	33	54

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls-2.6 pts behind walls (95% interval -5.2 to -0.1); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.142

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Wolf59.1%	56	61
Shun57.1%	55	62
Vanessa56.9%	55	60
Goh56.3%	55	58
Jacky54.3%	54	53
Lion54.1%	54	59
Aoi53.8%	55	55
Pai53.3%	50	58
Brad52.3%	52	53
El Blaze52.2%	51	53
Sarah52.1%	52	53
Lau51.7%	51	52
Jeffry51.7%	49	57
Taka51.3%	55	46
Lei Fei51.2%	53	44
Jean51.0%	48	60
Akira51.0%	50	51
Kage48.2%	48	51
Dural48.0%	44	51

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round Win Probability

Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Shun54.7%	52	55	49	57	61	53	57	48	57	59
Wolf54.4%	55	49	55	55	56	55	59	54	52	55
Vanessa53.0%	53	56	49	47	50	58	55	48	57	54
Goh52.8%	53	48	49	55	54	53	56	51	57	51
Pai52.6%	54	47	57	51	53	52	49	49	46	59
Brad52.3%	47	51	50	53	53	50	55	60	57	48
Aoi52.1%	51	57	57	54	57	55	47	48	49	46
Lion52.1%	46	52	58	55	49	55	35	48	53	58
Jacky52.0%	51	54	49	50	51	54	55	53	53	51
Lau51.4%	51	52	51	58	52	50	52	51	44	54
Jean51.0%	49	49	50	45	54	48	49	49	64	61
Lei Fei50.9%	51	50	57	50	45	46	58	53	47	50
Sarah50.9%	48	52	51	52	52	53	53	51	50	49
Akira50.7%	52	50	51	49	50	57	48	49	48	50
Dural50.5%	45	68	44	51	52	35	55	43	43	50
Jeffry50.4%	48	51	46	52	54	53	52	48	51	48
Taka50.2%	46	56	63	61	50	45	25	51	44	46
El Blaze50.1%	51	56	47	43	49	51	58	50	48	52
Kage49.2%	52	54	48	48	49	49	42	47	49	51

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls-1.0 pts behind walls (95% interval -2.3 to +0.2); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.323

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Shun54.7%	53	58
Wolf54.4%	53	55
Vanessa53.0%	52	55
Goh52.8%	53	52
Pai52.6%	51	55
Brad52.3%	53	51
Aoi52.1%	53	52
Lion52.1%	52	55
Jacky52.0%	52	52
Lau51.4%	51	52
Jean51.0%	50	54
Lei Fei50.9%	51	47
Sarah50.9%	51	51
Akira50.7%	50	52
Dural50.5%	50	49
Jeffry50.4%	49	52
Taka50.2%	53	47
El Blaze50.1%	49	51
Kage49.2%	49	49

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	1.25%	19	5,453
South America	1.34%	19	1,495
North America	0.97%	19	697
Europe	1.26%	17	185
Middle East	0.00%	10	0
Oceania	36.77%	1	82
Not recorded	4.40%	9	1,459

The same figures as a 1080×1080 card, for posting. Click it to copy the image. Full size ↗

Win rate51.2%

Standing#7 of 19 · tier A

Pick rate3.2%

Most picked#15 of 19

Matches counted3,520

Unique players33

Period2026/03/26 – 2026/09/23

Against the roster

Win rate in each matchup, over decided non-mirror matches

Opponent	Win %	Wins	Losses	Matches
Jean	72.38%	76	29	105
Sarah	63.08%	123	72	195
Jeffry	62.24%	61	37	98
Vanessa	61.39%	97	61	158
Pai	60.12%	101	67	168
Taka	56.67%	51	39	90
Kage	53.82%	148	127	275
Lau	51.26%	183	174	357
Lion	50.31%	161	159	320
Shun	50.00%	107	107	214
Wolf	50.00%	56	56	112
Aoi	47.78%	43	47	90
Brad	47.67%	92	101	193
Jacky	46.57%	163	187	350
Akira	45.54%	148	177	325
Dural	44.44%	8	10	18
Goh	42.40%	53	72	125
Lei Fei	40.46%	70	103	173
El Blaze	39.61%	61	93	154

By shapeWalls or no wallsBy shape · roundsWalls or no walls · rounds

Stage Impact To Win Probability

Change from this character's own win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage

Win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Jean72.4%	50	78	86	55	78	100	100	50	71	75
Sarah63.1%	73	59	69	57	69	59	64	67	56	77
Jeffry62.2%	60	64	62	54	83	100	100	38	57	60
Vanessa61.4%	87	68	42	59	56	38	100	75	48	62
Pai60.1%	50	62	68	45	77	29	67	60	82	59
Taka56.7%	83	43	55	69	33	50	38	45	70	57
Kage53.8%	65	57	47	62	50	52	46	41	57	44
Lau51.3%	53	67	25	65	44	44	47	38	58	52
Lion50.3%	50	48	44	43	54	36	50	55	58	62
Shun50.0%	60	78	46	48	37	45	31	48	45	71
Wolf50.0%	38	50	57	36	86	62	56	50	50	30
Aoi47.8%	75	50	50	58	38	71	33	44	38	50
Brad47.7%	62	50	29	57	33	67	56	31	38	48
Jacky46.6%	54	50	32	62	36	34	68	41	45	46
Akira45.5%	30	57	55	48	57	43	31	49	40	39
Dural44.4%	50	·	·	20	25	·	100	·	100	100
Goh42.4%	42	33	57	46	36	60	50	36	38	40
Lei Fei40.5%	19	33	50	44	47	47	38	21	69	39
El Blaze39.6%	50	43	50	32	33	29	44	53	29	57

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Against this character's own rate, in points

Walls or no walls+1.6 pts behind walls (95% interval -2.5 to +5.6); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.711

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Win Probability

Win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Jean72.4%	66	80
Sarah63.1%	63	67
Jeffry62.2%	57	74
Vanessa61.4%	63	51
Pai60.1%	60	55
Taka56.7%	60	48
Kage53.8%	55	49
Lau51.3%	53	47
Lion50.3%	50	51
Shun50.0%	53	52
Wolf50.0%	47	57
Aoi47.8%	50	52
Brad47.7%	46	48
Jacky46.6%	47	39
Akira45.5%	48	45
Dural44.4%	40	40
Goh42.4%	43	42
Lei Fei40.5%	37	43
El Blaze39.6%	41	42

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Stage Impact To Round Win Probability

Change from this character's own round win rate, in points

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Each matchup, stage by stage, in rounds

Round win rate in that matchup on that stage

Opponent	Full	Break. full	Half	Break. half	Low	Wall	Mixed	Oct	Rect	Open
Jean68.7%	52	69	74	63	75	95	100	47	62	75
Sarah60.9%	67	58	63	58	62	61	64	64	54	73
Vanessa56.4%	71	56	46	58	56	48	86	61	48	56
Jeffry56.0%	56	56	57	54	65	69	100	42	53	52
Pai55.3%	51	55	64	45	65	38	50	50	82	56
Taka52.8%	56	50	50	60	50	50	44	43	59	56
Kage52.7%	57	54	48	57	53	52	51	45	56	46
Wolf51.6%	45	45	58	46	80	54	50	51	51	46
Lau51.4%	53	60	42	57	47	49	46	46	54	50
Lion51.1%	54	49	45	45	55	45	44	51	55	60
Shun50.6%	55	63	49	48	43	47	46	49	48	63
Brad49.0%	58	50	39	52	45	56	49	45	41	51
Aoi48.1%	56	50	53	54	44	61	27	47	39	48
Akira48.1%	40	55	51	50	52	47	40	50	48	44
Jacky47.6%	50	51	42	56	46	43	54	43	47	45
Goh45.6%	46	40	56	43	42	48	59	44	46	43
Lei Fei44.9%	35	42	49	44	46	49	41	37	65	43
El Blaze44.9%	42	47	46	42	45	41	48	52	39	53
Dural44.3%	53	·	·	29	27	·	75	·	60	75

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Against this character's own round rate, in points

Walls or no walls+0.3 pts behind walls (95% interval -1.8 to +2.5); within chance across the 20 characters tested, q=0.761

How significance is decided

Each gap is two win rates compared with a pooled two-proportion z test, over decided matches only.
The 95% interval is Newcombe's hybrid score method, which keeps its shape near 0% and 100% where a symmetric interval does not.
q is p corrected for how many tests were asked at once, by Benjamini–Hochberg at a 5% false discovery rate. A figure is called real on q, never on p alone.
Standard errors are widened by a measured design effect, because one player appears in many matches and those matches are not independent of each other.
Stages are assigned at random, so a gap between them is the stage's own effect and not a difference in who chose to play where.

Walls Impact To Round Win Probability

Round win rate in that matchup with a wall, and without

Opponent	Walls	No walls
Jean68.7%	62	78
Sarah60.9%	60	65
Vanessa56.4%	57	53
Jeffry56.0%	54	58
Pai55.3%	56	53
Taka52.8%	53	52
Kage52.7%	53	50
Wolf51.6%	50	57
Lau51.4%	53	49
Lion51.1%	50	53
Shun50.6%	52	51
Brad49.0%	48	50
Aoi48.1%	50	51
Akira48.1%	49	47
Jacky47.6%	48	44
Goh45.6%	46	43
Lei Fei44.9%	44	45
El Blaze44.9%	45	47
Dural44.3%	44	37

Worse on this stageNo changeBetter on this stage

Where they are played

Share of that region's own picks, and where that ranks

Region	Share	Standing	Appearances
Asia	3.07%	15	3,130
North America	1.22%	16	51
Europe	7.22%	6	199
South America	18.90%	3	107
Not recorded	5.36%	8	175